[OpenSIPS-Users] need some help using opensips 3.0 cluster module .

Sasmita Panda spanda at 3clogic.com
Tue Aug 6 02:25:40 EDT 2019


In the same setup I wanted to do dialog replication . But I am facing some
problem . Please do help me . The cluster table looks like below .

| id | cluster_id | node_id | url                  | state |
no_ping_retries | priority | sip_addr    | flags | description |
|  1 |          1 |       1 | bin:192.168.0.x:5555 |     1 |
3 |       50 | 192.168.0.x | seed  | Node A      |
|  2 |          1 |       2 | bin:192.168.0.y:5555 |     1 |
3 |       50 | 192.168.0.y | seed  | Node B      |
|  3 |          1 |       3 | bin:192.168.0.z:5555 |     1 |
3 |       50 | 192.168.0.z | seed  | Node C
When I am setting the parameter
modparam("dialog", "dialog_replication_cluster", 1)

This gives me error On the other 2 nodes rather than 192.168.0.x .



* ERROR:dialog:receive_dlg_repl: Failed to process a binary packet!
WARNING:dialog:fetch_socket_info: non-local socket
<udp:192.168.0.x:5508>...ignoring ERROR:dialog:dlg_replicated_create:
Replicated dialog doesn't match caller's listening socket
udp:192.168.0.x:5508*


*If there is any Doc for dialog replication in 3.0 then please give me . *

*Thanks & Regards*
*Sasmita Panda*
*Senior Network Testing and Software Engineer*
*3CLogic , ph:07827611765*


On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 5:25 PM Sasmita Panda <spanda at 3clogic.com> wrote:

> Thank you .  I had never encountered this issue earlier .  Thank you . I
> am good to go without "m" flag .
> I will try to build our product to strictly follow  this Allow header
> rules according to RFC .
>
> Thank you for the information .
>
> *Thanks & Regards*
> *Sasmita Panda*
> *Senior Network Testing and Software Engineer*
> *3CLogic , ph:07827611765*
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 5:18 PM Liviu Chircu <liviu at opensips.org> wrote:
>
>> Exactly!  If we strictly obey RFC 3261, Sasmita's UA is basically saying:
>> "I do not support INVITE, do not bother sending such requests to me".
>> Most likely,
>> it does support it, but it poorly builds the "Allow" header.
>>
>> The above info on the "m" flag is also available in the save() flags
>> docs [1].
>>
>> [1]:
>> https://opensips.org/html/docs/modules/3.0.x/registrar.html#func_save
>>
>> Liviu Chircu
>> OpenSIPS Developer
>> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>
>> On 02.08.2019 14:21, Johan De Clercq wrote:
>> > It filters on methods.  Liviu, correct me if I am wrong :-)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20190806/cbd90a42/attachment.html>


More information about the Users mailing list