[OpenSIPS-Users] Adding pri_prefix to TO Header (I think I am being ripped off)

[Pete Kelly]

Unfortunately this is par for the course when dealing with 3rd party
interconnects.

Some will adhere to the RFC beautifully, and others (often large
multi-national telcos) will have their own interpretation of the RFC that
you find they require.

The best advice I can give here is to have a testing phase (even if only a
few calls) - so you can compare your respective understandings of costs and
CDRs before going fully live with a carrier.


Pete
http://www.voxbeam.com



On 10 December 2013 20:47, Nick Cameo <symack at gmail.com> wrote:

> Just did a text using uac_replace_to, and appended the prefix to the
> TO Header, and now the calls are going through. What kind of chemistry
> project is this? How many RFC standards are we breaking? Is there
> anyway to do this for just this service provider's (gateway + prefix)
> without hacking my beautifully scripted opensips file.
>
> Feature request? DB flag for adding prefix to the TO Header?
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Nick.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20131211/5e9cedc1/attachment.htm>