[OpenSIPS-Users] Dialog Ping

Thu Jul 14 22:13:54 CEST 2011

Not sure if it is an issue or not. When I test with Jitsi or Bria client  
they respond to the OPTIONS message with a 200 OK. I will post this on the  
Blink mailing list and see what they have to say. Thanks for the help and  
fixing the issue.

On Jul 14, 2011 10:18am, Duane Larson <duane.larson at gmail.com> wrote:
> I thought that might be the issue. I will look into what I am doing.

> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Vlad Paiu vladpaiu at opensips.org> wrote:

> Hello,

> Glad to see that it has worked.

> I see that the To and From headers are different in the generated pings,  
> sip:90133X9XX8 at irock.com vs sip:933X9XX8 at irock.com .

> Are you using uac_replace_to/uac_replace_from to mangled the To and From  
> headers, or how are you manipulating the headers ?

> Regards,
> --

> Vlad Paiu

> OpenSIPS Developer

> On 07/14/2011 06:01 PM, Duane Larson wrote:

> That fix did fix my issue. This is what I am seeing now and I am guessing  
> this could be an issue. Figure it might have something to do with the  
> fact that I change the To: and From: headers maybe?

> U 2011/07/14 09:55:01.570108 173.XXX.XXX.107:5060 -> 64.132.245.122:15073
> OPTIONS sip:drnahsqf at 64.132.245.122:15073 SIP/2.0.

> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 173.XXX.XXX.107;branch=z9hG4bK40f.8ea107f4.0.
> To: sip:90127X2XX9 at irock.com>;tag=6mZ.hX2A2HzZ2j99ttSvNxStBLVnzI4n.
> From: sip:933X9XX8 at irock.com>;tag=f55753a702964d54babd04143f8f831d.

> CSeq: 1 OPTIONS.
> Call-ID: AZ9B9EO4ZJo58X9UyZWv-pzeD7nyQaiM.
> Content-Length: 0.
> User-Agent: OpenSIPS (1.8.0-dev0-notls (x86_64/linux)).
> .

> #
> U 2011/07/14 09:55:01.570159 173.XXX.XXX.107:5060 -> 64.132.245.122:15052
> OPTIONS sip:mckldeuz at 64.132.245.122:15052 SIP/2.0.

> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 173.XXX.XXX.107;branch=z9hG4bKc3b7.c0c22472.0.
> To: sip:90133X9XX8 at irock.com>;tag=f55753a702964d54babd04143f8f831d.
> From: sip:90127X2XX9 at irock.com>;tag=6mZ.hX2A2HzZ2j99ttSvNxStBLVnzI4n.

> CSeq: 31012 OPTIONS.
> Call-ID: AZ9B9EO4ZJo58X9UyZWv-pzeD7nyQaiM.
> Content-Length: 0.
> User-Agent: OpenSIPS (1.8.0-dev0-notls (x86_64/linux)).
> .

> #
> U 2011/07/14 09:55:01.604366 64.132.245.122:15073 -> 173.XXX.XXX.107:5060
> SIP/2.0 500 Unhandled by dialog usages.
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP  
> 173.XXX.XXX.107;received=173.XXX.XXX.107;branch=z9hG4bK40f.8ea107f4.0.

> Call-ID: AZ9B9EO4ZJo58X9UyZWv-pzeD7nyQaiM.
> From: sip:933X9XX8 at irock.com>;tag=f55753a702964d54babd04143f8f831d.
> To: sip:90127X2XX9 at irock.com>;tag=6mZ.hX2A2HzZ2j99ttSvNxStBLVnzI4n.

> CSeq: 1 OPTIONS.
> Server: Blink 0.24.1 (MacOSX).
> Content-Length: 0.
> .

> #
> U 2011/07/14 09:55:01.607154 64.132.245.122:15052 -> 173.XXX.XXX.107:5060
> SIP/2.0 500 Unhandled by dialog usages.
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP  
> 173.XXX.XXX.107;received=173.XXX.XXX.107;branch=z9hG4bKc3b7.c0c22472.0.

> Call-ID: AZ9B9EO4ZJo58X9UyZWv-pzeD7nyQaiM.
> From: sip:90127X2XX9 at irock.com>;tag=6mZ.hX2A2HzZ2j99ttSvNxStBLVnzI4n.
> To: sip:90133X9XX8 at irock.com>;tag=f55753a702964d54babd04143f8f831d.

> CSeq: 31012 OPTIONS.
> Server: Blink 0.2.7 (Windows).
> Content-Length: 0.

> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Vlad Paiu vladpaiu at opensips.org> wrote:

> Hello Brett,

> In 1.6.x the dialog could have also been created by setting a flag from  
> the script, but this was dropped in 1.7.0.

> Quite a few modules used the Dialog internal API to create dialogs on  
> their own, like trace_dialog() in Siptrace, engage_rtp_proxy() in  
> RTPProxy, or even the ACC module when generating CDRs.

> The latest commit should fix all of these issues, where the dialog was  
> created internally by a function called from the script, and pinging or  
> automatic timeout would have been skipped.

> Regards,
> --

> Vlad Paiu

> OpenSIPS Developer

> On 07/14/2011 05:43 PM, Brett Nemeroff wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Vlad Paiu vladpaiu at opensips.org> wrote:

> Hello Duane,

> Just took a look at your config.
> What was happening is that you were first calling trace_dialog(), which  
> creates the dialog structure internally. When the call to  
> create_dialog("PpB") came later on, it already found that the dialog was  
> created and did not set the needed flags for pinging.

> Nice catch here...

> Are there any other "automatic dialog creation" methods that might  
> interfere with the dialog creation flags being set?

> -Brett

> _______________________________________________

> Users mailing list

> Users at lists.opensips.org

> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

> --
> --
> *--*--*--*--*--*
> Duane
> *--*--*--*--*--*
> --

> _______________________________________________

> Users mailing list

> Users at lists.opensips.org

> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

> --
> --
> *--*--*--*--*--*
> Duane
> *--*--*--*--*--*
> --

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110714/2394efcb/attachment.htm>