[OpenSIPS-Users] Freeswitch vs Asterisk

[paul.gore.j at gmail.com]

I just want to reply to mr Collins with FS: your post looks very much like advertisement, and I have seen that "fs is so much better than *" all over internet from people connected to fs. That is unethical to say the least. 
In fact we have exprerienced fs crashes with core dump at least  once in 6 months and we process just under 40K calls/month. 
As to "nat tools" which you mentioned they just do not work. In fact usually * box works much better for natted users.
As to xml curl interface - we do use it, and it's a pathetic way to feed a dialplan to a switch, since it's inefficient resource wise, but there was no other way available for real time solution where's * supports real time db out of the box. 
Trust me we do have development experience with both * socket interface and fs one, and in my opinion * solution is far better and has far less bugs.

-----Original Message-----
From: James Mbuthia
Sent:  12/08/2010 5:55:42 PM
Subject:  Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Freeswitch vs Asterisk