[OpenSIPS-Users] NAT: Why replacing "Contact" with thereceivedpublic IP:port instead of adding a parameter with it?
klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Wed Nov 12 10:39:22 CET 2008
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu schrieb:
> Hi Iñaki,
> If I'm not wrong, it's it the "maddr" param what you are looking for.
> Without aiming a bias, I was also evaluating the option to store the
> original contact and to restore it back.
Technically, I think maddr can be used (and there is some vendor
equipment which uses it) and is probably the easiest way to implement
But I think from the semantic point of view using maddr (=multicast
address) is misleading, as it is defined for usage of SIP with multicast.
> Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>> 2008/11/7 Schumann Sebastian <Sebastian.Schumann at t-com.sk>:
>>> Hi Inaki
>>> Yes, you are right. Seems my changes work where they should (all same type of phones where modification has to take place, Contact header somehow "well-defined") but are not universal.
>>> I will take your inputs to improve my used functions. Thanks!
>> I suggest you to study the SIP URI BNF grammar in RFC 3261. It's really complex.
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
More information about the Users