[Users] Re: [Devel] name for branch 1.2.x

Daniel-Constantin Mierla daniel at voice-system.ro
Mon Mar 12 14:39:11 CET 2007


On 03/12/07 15:30, Christian Schlatter wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>> another question :-) ,
>>
>> so shall we rename the old branches and tags to reflect the new 
>> naming schema?
>
> I'd recommend to do so in order to avoid confusion. The handy thing 
> about having an a.b branch is that one can checkout a branch and each 
> update will get all bug fixes for this branch.
Same opinion here, so we renamed branches to a.b and tags to a.b.c.

Cheers,
Daniel

>
> Christian
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 03/12/07 12:06, Henning Westerholt wrote:
>>> Am Montag, 12. Mdrz 2007 11:01 schrieb Klaus Darilion:
>>>  
>>>> This is also how asterisk does it and I'm fine with it. IMO it makes
>>>> sense to not have a "patch version number" in the branch name.
>>>>
>>>> btw: why not using "." instead of "_", e.g.
>>>>
>>>> Nevertheless we should also have tags for each release.
>>>>     
>>>
>>> As tags and branches are simply cheap copies in subversion, i second 
>>> this option.
>>> 1.2 for the branch, 1.2.0 - 1.2.N for the release tags.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Henning
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at openser.org
>>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>   
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at openser.org
>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at openser.org
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>




More information about the Users mailing list