[Users] Re: [Devel] name for branch 1.2.x

[Christian Schlatter]

Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> another question :-) ,
> 
> so shall we rename the old branches and tags to reflect the new naming 
> schema?

I'd recommend to do so in order to avoid confusion. The handy thing 
about having an a.b branch is that one can checkout a branch and each 
update will get all bug fixes for this branch.

Christian

> 
> Cheers,
> Daniel
> 
> 
> On 03/12/07 12:06, Henning Westerholt wrote:
>> Am Montag, 12. Mdrz 2007 11:01 schrieb Klaus Darilion:
>>  
>>> This is also how asterisk does it and I'm fine with it. IMO it makes
>>> sense to not have a "patch version number" in the branch name.
>>>
>>> btw: why not using "." instead of "_", e.g.
>>>
>>> Nevertheless we should also have tags for each release.
>>>     
>>
>> As tags and branches are simply cheap copies in subversion, i second 
>> this option.
>> 1.2 for the branch, 1.2.0 - 1.2.N for the release tags.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Henning
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at openser.org
>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>   
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at openser.org
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users