[Users] t_forward() functionality with t_relay()?

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Greg,

the send function take as script parameter the destination address, so 
the RURI will not be used.

regards,
bogdan

Greg Fausak wrote:

> Howdy,
>
> Will the send() function still resolve the RURI destination?
> That is, if the destination is 123 at test.com, and test.com has a srv
> record, will send() forward the packet to the srv address?
> Know what I mean?
>
> -g
>
>
> On 9/4/06, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at voice-system.ro> wrote:
>
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>>
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > On 09/02/06 01:21, Greg Fausak wrote:
>> >
>> >> I've got a dumb question.
>> >>
>> >> Can I get t_relay() functionality (transactions and whatnot)
>> >> without getting the Via
>> >
>>
>> there is an undocumented function which can be used to send a request
>> statelessly to another server without having VIA added:
>>     send(address);
>>
>> regards,
>> bogdan
>>
>> >
>> > Via is mandatory. Otherwise the reply will not come back on the 
>> same way.
>> >
>> >> and potentially Record-Route tags in
>> >> the header???
>> >>
>> >
>> > Do not use record_route()
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Daniel
>> >
>> >
>> >> I warned you it was dumb....
>> >> -g
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Users mailing list
>> > Users at openser.org
>> > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>> >
>>
>>
>
>