[OpenSIPS-Users] Drouting /timerec documentation for 3.2 vs 3.1

[Ben Newlin]

No, I think that was the only place. Thank you!

Ben Newlin

From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org>
Date: Friday, November 19, 2021 at 2:39 AM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list <users at lists.opensips.org>, Ben Newlin <Ben.Newlin at genesys.com>, pkelly at gmail.com <pkelly at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Drouting /timerec documentation for 3.2 vs 3.1
Hi Ben,

Fixes what I found on this matter, see [1]. Do you see any of these leftovers left in the current doc ?

[1] https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/394ba080486f97f44afaf794fa82aba1f630b186<https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/394ba080486f97f44afaf794fa82aba1f630b186>

Thanks and regards,


Bogdan-Andrei Iancu



OpenSIPS Founder and Developer

  https://www.opensips-solutions.com<https://www.opensips-solutions.com>

OpenSIPS eBootcamp 2021

  https://opensips.org/training/OpenSIPS_eBootcamp_2021/<https://opensips.org/training/OpenSIPS_eBootcamp_2021>
On 11/18/21 4:04 PM, Ben Newlin wrote:
While you are in the drouting module docs, there are multiple places in there where the changes from flags to sort_alg were not documented, especially for dr_carriers routing.

Ben Newlin

From: Users <users-bounces at lists.opensips.org><mailto:users-bounces at lists.opensips.org> on behalf of Liviu Chircu <liviu at opensips.org><mailto:liviu at opensips.org>
Date: Thursday, November 18, 2021 at 5:14 AM
To: pkelly at gmail.com<mailto:pkelly at gmail.com> <pkelly at gmail.com><mailto:pkelly at gmail.com>
Cc: OpenSIPS users mailling list <users at lists.opensips.org><mailto:users at lists.opensips.org>
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Drouting /timerec documentation for 3.2 vs 3.1
On 18.11.2021 12:09, Pete Kelly wrote:
> It looks like there are quite a few inconsistencies on the drouting
> documentation page versus the docs here
> https://opensips.org/docs/modules/3.2.x/cfgutils.html#func_check_time_rec<https://opensips.org/docs/modules/3.2.x/cfgutils.html#func_check_time_rec>
> <https://opensips.org/docs/modules/3.2.x/cfgutils.html#func_check_time_rec<https://opensips.org/docs/modules/3.2.x/cfgutils.html#func_check_time_rec>>
> - so maybe just a link or reference to check_time_rec would work for
> consistency?

Most likely, any timerec-related info on that page is outdated.  Will
double-check all the content when I get to this task.  I like the idea
to link to check_time_rec(), as it will future-proof the drouting docs
against changes to the core, common function.

--
Liviu Chircu
www.twitter.com/liviuchircu<http://www.twitter.com/liviuchircu> | www.opensips-solutions.com<http://www.opensips-solutions.com>
OpenSIPS eBootcamp 2021: www.opensips.org/training<http://www.opensips.org/training>


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users at lists.opensips.org<mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users<http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users>



_______________________________________________

Users mailing list

Users at lists.opensips.org<mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>

http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users<http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20211119/05cd7b9f/attachment.html>