[OpenSIPS-Users] feasablity / interest in a feature request.
Răzvan Crainea
razvan at opensips.org
Fri Jan 22 14:50:59 EST 2021
Hi Johan!
Just as Ben indicated, you should get two HEP packages per call the
inbound, which is the message unchanged, and the outbound, which is the
message sent over the network. Basically you should get both messages -
are you getting only one? Or you're getting two, but duplicates?
Best regards,
Răzvan Crainea
OpenSIPS Core Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 1/22/21 4:36 PM, johan wrote:
> I use this for invite based dialogs.
>
> trace("hep_id","d","sip");
>
> I call it just before topology_hiding()
>
> I don't see from/to header changes.
>
> Can you check on your side Ben ?
>
>
> wkr,
>
> On 22/01/2021 15:28, Ben Newlin wrote:
>>
>> We are using siptrace and we get both the incoming and outbound
>> message captured, with all changes. I think it depends on the scope
>> you provide [1]. We use scope T for transactions and we get both.
>>
>> Although, we are using OpenSIPS 2.4. It’s possible the functionality
>> has changed in 3.x. In which case, I would agree that it is not good.
>>
>> [1] - https://opensips.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/tracer.html#func_trace
>> <https://opensips.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/tracer.html#func_trace>
>>
>> Ben Newlin
>>
>> *From: *Users <users-bounces at lists.opensips.org> on behalf of Andy
>> Dierlam <adierlam at ptgi-ics.com>
>> *Date: *Friday, January 22, 2021 at 9:13 AM
>> *To: *OpenSIPS users mailling list <users at lists.opensips.org>
>> *Subject: *Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] feasablity / interest in a feature
>> request.
>>
>> How about running a continuous tshark/pcap/ngrep on interfaces of
>> interest.
>>
>> you can run every 10min. putting in 10min files.
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 6:36 AM johan <johan at democon.be
>> <mailto:johan at democon.be>> wrote:
>>
>> yeah me too.
>>
>> but I want also to see the forwarded packet with all changes.
>>
>> On 22/01/2021 12:13, Nick Altmann wrote:
>>
>> It depends on purpose. For example, I need an initial
>> (untouched) packet there.
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Nick
>>
>> пт, 22 янв. 2021 г. в 09:18, johan <johan at democon.be
>> <mailto:johan at democon.be>>:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> when you use the siptrace module and you go to homer from
>> opensips
>> (hence without a port mirror/span port on a switch), when
>> you change
>> from /to header, then the homer trace doesnot reflect the
>> real packet
>> that exits opensips (as we all know, from to header
>> changes are only
>> active when the packet is send out).
>>
>>
>> I find this annoying as the purpose of having a tracer is
>> defeated by
>> this : we want to see the real packets with the changes
>> applied.
>>
>>
>> Therefore : are there more people on the list who are
>> ennoyed by this ?
>> If yes, then I will open a feature request for it.
>>
>>
>> wkr,
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>> <http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Users mailing list
>>
>> Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>>
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users <http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>> <http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
More information about the Users
mailing list