[OpenSIPS-Users] Convert 183 to 180?

[David Villasmil]

I think he’s just confused thinking that would change the reply TO THE
provider. But this is not the case, the reply 183 comes FROM the provider
and by “intercepting” it and changing it to 180, it’s the 180 what goes to
the caller.

On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 14:26, Ben Newlin <Ben.Newlin at genesys.com> wrote:

> You are trying to change a reply because the 183 response is a reply to
> the INVITE. It is not the final reply, but it is still a reply. In fact,
> the change_reply_status  function explicitly does not allow you to change
> final replies, only provisional replies like 1xx.
>
>
>
> You need to use an onreply_route [1], either the global one or a
> transaction one using t_on_reply [2], and the in that reply route you will
> check if the response is 183 (t_check_status [3]) and if it is use
> change_reply_status to change it to a 180.
>
>
>
> [1] https://www.opensips.org/Documentation/Script-Routes-2-4#toc4
>
> [2] https://opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.4.x/tm.html#func_t_on_reply
>
> [3]
> https://opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.4.x/tm.html#func_t_check_status
>
>
>
>
>
> Ben Newlin
>
>
>
> *From: *Users <users-bounces at lists.opensips.org> on behalf of David
> Villasmil <david.villasmil.work at gmail.com>
> *Reply-To: *OpenSIPS users mailling list <users at lists.opensips.org>
> *Date: *Wednesday, October 9, 2019 at 5:42 AM
> *To: *OpenSIPS users mailling list <users at lists.opensips.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Convert 183 to 180?
>
>
>
> That’s exactly what it does. You might want to check for the absence of
> sdp with
>
>
>
> if(has_body("application/sdp"))
>
>
>
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 10:03, solarmon <solarmon at one-n.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Had a quick look at the change_reply_status() function and I'm a bit
> unsure as it suitability for what I am wanting to do.
>
>
>
> Our setup has opensips sitting between our system and a SIP provider. The
> 183 is coming from SIP provider and I would like to convert this to 180
> before passing it on to our system.
>
>
>
> The documentation for change_reply_status() suggest it is used to
> "Intercept a SIP reply". I am not looking to change a 'reply' to the SIP
> provider, or to our system. I want to convert the 183 message from the SIP
> provider and pass it on as 180 to our system.
>
>
>
> Will this  change_reply_status() function allow us to do that?
>
>
>
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 14:23, solarmon <solarmon at one-n.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Thanks. I forgot to say that I'm using openSIPS 2.4.x, but the same
> function is available for it too:
>
>
>
>
> https://opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.4.x/sipmsgops.html#change_reply_status
>
>
>
>
> Thanks for the tip!
>
>
>
>
>
> [image: Image removed by sender.]
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
>
> Virus-free. www.avg.com
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 14:00, Ben Newlin <Ben.Newlin at genesys.com> wrote:
>
> I think you are looking for this:
> https://opensips.org/html/docs/modules/3.0.x/sipmsgops.html#change_reply_status
>
>
>
> Ben Newlin
>
>
>
> *From: *Users <users-bounces at lists.opensips.org> on behalf of solarmon <
> solarmon at one-n.co.uk>
> *Reply-To: *OpenSIPS users mailling list <users at lists.opensips.org>
> *Date: *Monday, October 7, 2019 at 5:15 AM
> *To: *OpenSIPS users mailling list <users at lists.opensips.org>
> *Subject: *[OpenSIPS-Users] Convert 183 to 180?
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Our system connected to openSIPS is not handling 183 (with and without
> SDP) very well and is non-trivial for us to try to change the behavior. If
> we receive an initial 183 without SDP, it does not processed a subsequent
> 183 with SDP.
>
>
>
> We would like to explore how 183 (with and without SDP) can be converted
> to 180 (with and without SDP) see if this can resolve our issues. Can this
> be achieved and are there any examples of how this could be done?
>
>
>
> Thank you in advance for any help.
>
>
>
> *Error! Filename not specified.*
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
>
> Virus-free. www.avg.com
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> David Villasmil
>
> email: david.villasmil.work at gmail.com
>
> phone: +34669448337
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-- 
Regards,

David Villasmil
email: david.villasmil.work at gmail.com
phone: +34669448337
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20191009/72defde5/attachment.html>