[OpenSIPS-Users] I need some suggestions regarding registrar and usrloc module .
bogdan at opensips.org
Tue Mar 26 03:41:37 EDT 2019
That is not RFC compliant behavior as you de-syncronize the registrar
and the UAC in terms of the known registered contacts. So you either
return *ALL* registered contact, either limit the registered contact to
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
OpenSIPS Summit 2019
On 03/26/2019 09:36 AM, Sasmita Panda wrote:
> Yes , That's right . Also the oldest 10 contacts .
> */Thanks & Regards/*
> /Sasmita Panda/
> /Senior Network Testing and Software Engineer/
> /3CLogic , ph:07827611765/
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 1:00 PM Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> <bogdan at opensips.org <mailto:bogdan at opensips.org>> wrote:
> Hi Sasmita,
> Just to be sure I get it right - you do not want OpenSIPS to limit
> and accept only 10 contacts per user (so it can accept more), but
> you OpenSIPS to return up to 10 contact (even if 15 registered) in
> the 200 OK reply of the register ?
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
> OpenSIPS Summit 2019
> On 03/25/2019 12:06 PM, Sasmita Panda wrote:
>> Hi All ,
>> I was using opensips-1.11 previously . Now trying to upgrade this
>> to opensips-2.4 .
>> I have a query . I was using a feature , if a username is
>> register from more that 10 different places , then for that
>> username in 200 OK reply opensips always send latest 10 contacts
>> not all .
>> We have done some code changes in 1.11 for this feature . Now in
>> 2.4 this is not there in the code . So off course I have to
>> change the code . Before that , I wanted to know , If there is
>> any other way I can achieve this without any code changes .
>> Merging 1.11 code with 2.4 is quite difficult for me . There is
>> huge difference in code level .
>> Please do help , if anything possible .
>> */Thanks & Regards/*
>> /Sasmita Panda/
>> /Senior Network Testing and Software Engineer/
>> /3CLogic , ph:07827611765/
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Users