[OpenSIPS-Users] topology_hinding & load_balancer

Mirko Csiky mirko.csiky at gmail.com
Mon Mar 12 12:16:55 EDT 2018

Hi Bogdan,
Thanks for info!
In fact, the problem did not even exist ! The real problem was caused by
SIPP "pause" command: it didnt work (at all).
So the SIPP uac scenario (invite, ack, pause 20secodns,bye) worked withoud
"pause 20seconds" -> the calls were so fast that TH & LB monitoring with
fifo lb_list  was not possible (lb_load was always 0). That was the cause
that i thought: it doesnt funtcionate at all!
Since we replaced SIPP uac client with real client, the problem can not be
I have another problem now there:
  In incoming INVITE, in Contact header is "src" parameter (the part of
SIPREC). This parameter will be omitted by OpenSips ( with TH & LB ) in
forwareded INVITE ! (xml from multipart will be forwarded)
Can you help here ? Is it possible to recreate it - by some options /
manipulations in routing script ?
best regards

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 3:25 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org>

> Hi Mirko,
> I suspect you messed up the routing for sequential requests when you added
> the TH. And if the sequential requests are not properly handled anymore
> from dialog perspective, the dialog module will not be able to count the
> ongoing calls, so the balancing process will get broken.
> Have you added/replaced the "loose_route()" with "topology_hiding_match()"
> in your script ?
> If you do "dlg_list" do you see the calls in state 4 (established) ?
> Regards,
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>   http://www.opensips-solutions.com
> OpenSIPS Summit 2018
>   http://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2018Amsterdam
> On 03/06/2018 04:42 PM, Mirko Csiky wrote:
> Hi community,
> since we activated the topology hiding module in our load_balance test
> scenario (sipp uac -> opensips & load_balance ->  5x - sipp uas), load
> balance functionality always choose the same destination (from 5 possible).
> I can not see the link between topology_hiding & load_balance_destination_choice,
> why is it so ?
> Does anyone have experience with topology_hiding&load_balance  /
> workaround-idea ?
> best regards
> Mirko
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing listUsers at lists.opensips.orghttp://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20180312/8917ce4e/attachment.html>

More information about the Users mailing list