[OpenSIPS-Users] SDES-no is unsupported on opensips

Răzvan Crainea razvan at opensips.org
Mon Jan 8 03:10:19 EST 2018


Hi, Tito!

The documentation states: "When passing an option that OpenSIPS is not 
aware of, it will be blindly sent to the rtpengine daemon to be 
processed."[2]

[2] 
http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.3.x/rtpengine.html#rtpengine.f.rtpengine_offer

Best regards,

Răzvan Crainea
OpenSIPS Developer
www.opensips-solutions.com

On 01/06/2018 01:37 AM, Tito Cumpen wrote:
> Razvan,
>
> Thanks for the insight. I made an assumption since the documentation 
> for the module didn't have it available as one of the flags for 2.3 as 
> well.
> http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.3.x/rtpengine.html
>
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 1:59 AM, Răzvan Crainea <razvan at opensips.org 
> <mailto:razvan at opensips.org>> wrote:
>
>     Your assumption is not completely true - although OpenSIPS 2.1 and
>     2.2 versions do not support this option, OpenSIPS 2.3 does.
>
>     Best regards,
>
>     Răzvan Crainea
>     OpenSIPS Developer
>     www.opensips-solutions.com <http://www.opensips-solutions.com>
>
>     On 01/05/2018 03:03 AM, Tito Cumpen wrote:
>>     Group,
>>
>>
>>     The newest version of Chrome 63 requires either DTLS or SDES to
>>     be offered but not both. RTPENGINE offers both by default. Which
>>     will render the following issues.
>>      "Cryptos must be empty when DTLS is active"
>>     . I've tried disabling SDES by adding an offer flag SDES-no but I
>>     get the following error.
>>
>>     ERROR:rtpengine:parse_flags: error processing flag `SDES-no':
>>     unknown flag
>>
>>     which removes all sort of media translation. Can anyone provide a
>>     reason to why this is not available. I took this up with their
>>     github page
>>
>>     https://github.com/sipwise/rtpengine/issues/437#issuecomment-355442840
>>     <https://github.com/sipwise/rtpengine/issues/437#issuecomment-355442840>
>>
>>     and came to the conclusion that opensips isn't supporting the flag.
>>
>>     Thanks,
>>     Tito
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Users mailing list
>>     Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>>     http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>     <http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Users mailing list
>     Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>     http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>     <http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20180108/d0135165/attachment.html>


More information about the Users mailing list