[OpenSIPS-Users] SIP-I and CANCEL

[Giovanni Maruzzelli]

On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, 18:45 Vlad Patrascu <vladp at opensips.org wrote:

> Hi Giovanni,
>
> Although I'm not claiming to be an expert at all in isup-sip interworking,
> the ITU Q.1912.5 document seems to say that it is not necessary to
> encapsulate REL in CANCEL. You can take a look at the example in Figure
> III.13/Q.1912.5 from Appendix III section of the document.
>

Thanks a lot Vlad!
I will sure look into It.

Btw, SIP-I module rocks!

-Giovanni



Regards,
>
> Vlad Patrascu
> OpenSIPS Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com
>
> On 12/07/2018 07:18 PM, Giovanni Maruzzelli wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 6:14 PM Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Giovanni,
>>
>> The CANCEL is hop-by-hop, which means each SIP hop will generate a
>> completely new CANCEL (to be sent further) - there is not proxying, so the
>> changes you do over the incoming CANCEL will not propagate into the
>> outgoing CANCEL.
>>
>
> Ciao Bogdan,
>
> yep, saw that
>
>
>>
>> I cannot recall it, but is there a standard case of pushing ISUP into
>> CANCEL ?
>>
>>
> Not sure at all, I am looking around in various (too much) documentation
> around the intertube, not yet sure if you must put isup REL into CANCEL or
> not...
>
> Have a nice wend!
> -giovanni
>
> --
> Sincerely,
>
> Giovanni Maruzzelli
> OpenTelecom.IT
> cell: +39 347 266 56 18
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing listUsers at lists.opensips.orghttp://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20181207/caf11b51/attachment-0001.html>