[OpenSIPS-Users] opensips $Revision: 4448 $
Khalil Khamlichi
khamlichi.khalil at gmail.com
Mon Jan 16 17:31:39 EST 2017
I confirm, your suggestion works perfect :
failure_route[GW_FAILOVER] {
if (t_was_cancelled()) {
exit;
}
# detect failure and redirect to next available GW
if (t_check_status("(408)|488|([56][0-9][0-9])")) {
xlog("Failed GW $rd detected \n");
if ( use_next_gw() ) {
t_on_failure("GW_FAILOVER");
*do_accounting("db|log","failed|missed",);*
t_relay();
exit;
}
send_reply("500","All GW are down");
}
}
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Răzvan Crainea <razvan at opensips.org>
wrote:
> Yes, please try that. To be honest, I've never done it using the new
> accounting module, but this might do the trick.
> Also, did you take a look at the multi-legging accounting?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Răzvan Crainea
> OpenSIPS Solutionswww.opensips-solutions.com
>
> On 01/16/2017 01:18 PM, Khalil Khamlichi wrote:
>
> Oki, I will modify my old failure_route :
>
>
> failure_route[GW_FAILOVER] {
>
> if (t_was_cancelled()) {
> exit;
> }
>
> # detect failure and redirect to next available GW
> if (t_check_status("(408)|488|([56][0-9][0-9])")) {
> #xlog("Failed GW $rd detected \n");
>
> if ( use_next_gw() ) {
> t_on_failure("GW_FAILOVER");
> t_relay();
> exit;
> }
>
> send_reply("500","All GW are down");
> }
> }
>
>
> to :
>
>
> failure_route[GW_FAILOVER] {
>
> if (t_was_cancelled()) {
> exit;
> }
>
> # detect failure and redirect to next available GW
> if (t_check_status("(408)|488|([56][0-9][0-9])")) {
> xlog("Failed GW $rd detected \n");
>
> if ( use_next_gw() ) {
> t_on_failure("GW_FAILOVER");
> *do_accounting("db|log","failed|missed",);*
> t_relay();
> exit;
> }
>
> send_reply("500","All GW are down");
> }
> }
>
>
> right ?
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Răzvan Crainea <razvan at opensips.org>
> wrote:
>
>> I was asking you to call do_accounting() in failure route, for each leg.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Răzvan Crainea
>> OpenSIPS Solutionswww.opensips-solutions.com
>>
>> On 01/16/2017 12:02 PM, Khalil Khamlichi wrote:
>>
>> sorry mistype, I am calling do_accounting() twice.
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Khalil Khamlichi <
>> khamlichi.khalil at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> thanks for your much appreciated help,
>>> I am calling do_routing twice.
>>>
>>> Here is my actual opensips.cfg :
>>>
>>> route {
>>> ...
>>> ...
>>>
>>> ...
>>> ...
>>> if (has_totag()) {
>>> # sequential request withing a dialog should
>>> # take the path determined by record-routing
>>> if (loose_route()) {
>>>
>>> # validate the sequential request against dialog
>>> if ( $DLG_status!=NULL && !validate_dialog() ) {
>>> xlog("In-Dialog $rm from $si (callid=$ci)
>>> is not valid according to dialog\n");
>>> }
>>>
>>> if (is_method("BYE")) {
>>> # do accounting even if the transaction
>>> fails
>>> do_accounting("db|log","failed|missed",);
>>> } else if (is_method("INVITE")) {
>>> # even if in most of the cases is
>>> useless, do RR for
>>> # re-INVITEs alos, as some buggy clients
>>> do change route set
>>> # during the dialog.
>>> record_route();
>>> }
>>> ...
>>> ...
>>>
>>> ...
>>> ...
>>> $acc_extra(gwid)=$avp(gw_id);
>>>
>>> t_on_failure("GW_FAILOVER");
>>>
>>> do_accounting("db|log","cdr|missed",);
>>> #NAT
>>> if (isbflagset(NAT)) setflag(NAT);
>>> #NAT
>>> route(RELAY);
>>> }
>>>
>>> # END OF MAIN ROUTE
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Răzvan Crainea <razvan at opensips.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi, Khalil!
>>>>
>>>> Did you try to call the do_accounting() function for each leg going to
>>>> the next gateway?
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Răzvan Crainea
>>>> OpenSIPS Solutionswww.opensips-solutions.com
>>>>
>>>> On 01/15/2017 12:24 AM, Khalil Khamlichi wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> I am testing opensips 2.2, 2.3 I have tried to configure acc module to
>>>> save to db failed calls on drouting configuration, I have found that it
>>>> does save only the first failed call (that is the first gateway) it does
>>>> not save to database any other failures on second and third gateways that
>>>> are tried for the call.
>>>> is this the expected behavioure ?
>>>> Thanks for your help.
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>> kh
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Users mailing listUsers at lists.opensips.orghttp://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________ Users mailing list
>>>> Users at lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-
>>>> bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing listUsers at lists.opensips.orghttp://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>> _______________________________________________ Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-
>> bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing listUsers at lists.opensips.orghttp://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170116/fe6f3037/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Users
mailing list