[OpenSIPS-Users] nat issue

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bogdan at opensips.org
Thu Nov 17 12:11:52 CET 2016


Hi Miha,

yes, that is parallel forking (you may have more than 2 contacts only).

Are you sure your DB was sync'ed? OpenSIPS is periodically flushing the 
memory cache into the location table (see the "state" of the contact (as 
per "ul show") if marked as DIRTY).

In regards to RFC, I think you quote the wrong section (maybe about 
callings?) - for REGISTERs, any number of URIs are allowed AFAIK.

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com

On 17.11.2016 12:35, Miha wrote:
> Bodan
>
> so this is dual forking...?
> So if you have one account and you have two phones on it and first 
> will try  to register, 200 ok will will have contact of both phones?
> In location table I can see only one registration for this user but 
> for "opensipsctl ul show" it shows me two contacts, which is strange? 
> (When i do trace only one invite is send) and UAC replay with Busy all 
> the time due to two contacts (this what i have been told).
>
> Ok, but if you look at rfc there is only one URI allowed in contact if 
> I understand this right?
>
>
> The Contact header field MUST be present and contain exactly one SIP
>     or SIPS URI in any request that can result in the establishment of a
>     dialog
>
> Please correct me if I am wrong. tnx so much! Miha
>
> On 17/11/2016 11:22, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>> Hi Miha,
>>
>> OpenSIPS returns in the 200 OK for a REGISTER all the valid 
>> registrations for that user (for all the devices the user may have).
>>
>> I guess your user has 2 registrations, so the 200 OK will report back 
>> both of them. You can check via "opensipsctl ul show"
>>
>> Regards,
>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>> On 17.11.2016 12:13, Miha wrote:
>>> Hello Bogdan
>>>
>>> i changed this and it works in all cases, only in one I noticed 
>>> today this (Opensips reply only in this case with two URI on contact):
>>>
>>>  UAC:5060 ->OpenSIPS:5060
>>> REGISTER sip:opsp.test.net:5060 SIP/2.0.
>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP opsp.test.net;branch=z9hG4bKa40225bd7495297c6.
>>> Max-Forwards: 70.
>>> From: 042335040 <sip:99942335040 at opsp.test.net>;tag=1f62205074.
>>> To: 042335040 <sip:99942335040 at opsp.test.net>.
>>> Call-ID: 61c67f739bef5a2e.
>>> CSeq: 1804289391 REGISTER.
>>> Allow:  INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, NOTIFY, REFER, OPTIONS, UPDATE,
>>> PRACK, INFO.
>>> Authorization: Digest
>>> username="99942335040",realm="opsp.test.net",nonce="582d810c000058b
>>> d73adccf0d455c2a2159b3a3403c1f7a3",uri="sip:opsp.test.net:5060",res
>>> ponse="bc0c757c17f9b0976af35ec633dd83ca".
>>> Contact: 042335040 <sip:99942335040 at opsp.test.net;transport=udp>;ex
>>> pires=3600.
>>> Privacy: none.
>>> Supported: path.
>>> User-Agent: Brcm-Callctrl/v1.10.3 M5T SIP Stack/4.1.2.2.
>>> Content-Length: 0.
>>>
>>> UOpenSIPS:5060 -> UAC:5060
>>> SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized.
>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>> opsp.test.net;received=UAC;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKa4022
>>> 5bd7495297c6.
>>> From: 042335040 <sip:99942335040 at opsp.test.net>;tag=1f62205074.
>>> To: 042335040 <sip:99942335040 at opsp.test.net>;tag=0c7ff67d927afc274
>>> b272138ce65100a.ac4d.
>>> Call-ID: 61c67f739bef5a2e.
>>> CSeq: 1804289391 REGISTER.
>>> WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="opsp.test.net",
>>> nonce="582d811300005a88b92d0287a7460acce0a84e5d2a200b33", stale=true.
>>> Server: OpenSIPS (1.10.0beta-tls (x86_64/linux)).
>>> Content-Length: 0.
>>>
>>>
>>> U UAC:5060 ->OpenSIPS:5060
>>> REGISTER sip:opsp.test.net:5060 SIP/2.0.
>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP opsp.test.net;branch=z9hG4bKb5f2bbbf80e346f48.
>>> Max-Forwards: 70.
>>> From: 042335040 <sip:99942335040 at opsp.test.net>;tag=1f62205074.
>>> To: 042335040 <sip:99942335040 at opsp.test.net>.
>>> Call-ID: 61c67f739bef5a2e.
>>> CSeq: 1804289392 REGISTER.
>>> Allow:  INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, NOTIFY, REFER, OPTIONS, UPDATE,
>>> PRACK, INFO.
>>> Authorization: Digest
>>> username="99942335040",realm="opsp.test.net",nonce="582d811300005a8
>>> 8b92d0287a7460acce0a84e5d2a200b33",uri="sip:opsp.test.net:5060",res
>>> ponse="9ce3622addeedf74622a23697e6f3728".
>>> Contact: 042335040 <sip:99942335040 at opsp.test.net;transport=udp>;ex
>>> pires=3600.
>>> Privacy: none.
>>> Supported: path.
>>> User-Agent: Brcm-Callctrl/v1.10.3 M5T SIP Stack/4.1.2.2.
>>> Content-Length: 0.
>>> .
>>>
>>>
>>> UOpenSIPS:5060 -> UAC:5060
>>> SIP/2.0 200 OK.
>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>> opsp.test.net;received=UAC;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKb5f2b
>>> bbf80e346f48.
>>> From: 042335040 <sip:99942335040 at opsp.test.net>;tag=1f62205074.
>>> To: 042335040 <sip:99942335040 at opsp.test.net>;tag=766e4f757c55b3450
>>> c9992a50fb64799-9163.
>>> Call-ID: 61c67f739bef5a2e.
>>> CSeq: 1804289392 REGISTER.
>>> Contact: <sip:99942335040 at opsp.test.net;transport=udp>;expires=3600
>>> ;received="sip:UAC:5060", <sip:99942335040 at UAC:1024
>>> > ;expires=119.
>>> Server: OpenSIPS (1.10.0beta-tls (x86_64/linux)).
>>> Content-Length: 0.
>>>
>>> Do you see where could be an issue?
>>>
>>>
>>> tnx
>>> miha
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16/11/2016 08:11, Miha wrote:
>>>> Hello Bogdan
>>>>
>>>> yes this was the case...
>>>>
>>>> thank you!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> br
>>>> miha
>>>>
>>>> On 15/11/2016 18:35, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>>>>> Hi Miha,
>>>>>
>>>>> When you handle REGISTER requests (from behind NAT) most probably 
>>>>> you use fix_nated_contact() instead of fix_nated_register().
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>>>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>>>>> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>>>> On 15.11.2016 09:11, Miha wrote:
>>>>>> Hello
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i need one info.
>>>>>> I have one phone behind NAT and it is registered on OpenSIPS. IN 
>>>>>> register packet, which is send to OpenSIPS I can see contact: 
>>>>>> "sip:11181600519 at 192.168.0.101:5060;transport=UDP"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and let says that the public ip for this device is xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When opensips sends INVITE it send to right public ip and right 
>>>>>> port (source ip and source port generated by router). The issue 
>>>>>> is this:
>>>>>> Invite is like:  
>>>>>> "sip:11181600519 at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060;transport=UDP" and this 
>>>>>> request is then fw to this UAC behind router. The UAC replays to 
>>>>>> this INVITE with 404 Not found as it is waiting to receive the 
>>>>>> same URI which was written in contact (the userpart is ok, put 
>>>>>> the ip is public, not private and this is the issue).From what I 
>>>>>> can see in RFC this is the case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Till now Idid not have any issues with this, but now I found 
>>>>>> first phone which replays with 404 and from RFC point of view 
>>>>>> there should be private ip request :) . So is there anything I 
>>>>>> can do :)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> tnx
>>>>>> miha
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Users mailing list
>>>>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>>>>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20161117/720e60cd/attachment.htm>


More information about the Users mailing list