[OpenSIPS-Users] Re-Invite routed to private IP

Barış ŞEKERCİLER bsekerciler at didtelekom.com.tr
Tue May 3 09:20:45 CEST 2016


You could click "unsubscribe" button.
Why are you swearing?

> On 29 Apr 2016, at 19:21, Ali Ariyayi <ariyayi_67 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> fuck you
> fuck you
> 
> do not send mail for me
> 
> fuck you
> 
> fuck your parents 
> 
> sun of the bech
> 
> 
> On Friday, April 29, 2016 8:49 PM, Ali Ariyayi <ariyayi_67 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> fuck you
> fuck you
> 
> do not send mail for me
> 
> fuck you
> 
> fuck your parents 
> 
> sun of the bech
> 
> 
> On Friday, April 29, 2016 8:48 PM, Ali Ariyayi <ariyayi_67 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> fuck you
> fuck you
> 
> do not send mail for me
> 
> fuck you
> 
> fuck your parents 
> 
> sun of the bech
> 
> 
> On Friday, April 29, 2016 6:56 PM, Julian Santer <julian.santer at rolmail.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> Ok. I read the OpenSips doc of force_rport again:
> Force_rport() adds the rport parameter to the first Via header. Thus, OpenSIPS will add the received IP port to the top most via header in the SIP 
> message, even if the client does not indicate support for rport. This enables subsequent SIP messages to return to the proper port later on in a SIP 
> transaction.
> 
> I misunderstand th "received IP port" maybe ;-)
> 
> But we didn't have this problems before changing the platform.
> 
> The Re-Invite enters here, and as I saw in syslog, the topology_hiding matches and also the uac_test is be done:
> 
> if (has_totag())
> {
>     if (topology_hiding_match())
>     {
>         if (nat_uac_test("127"))
>         {
>             xlog("L_INFO", "Topology hided, Contact fixed - LF_BASE");
>             fix_nated_contact();
>         }
> 
>         t_relay();
>         exit;
> }
> 
> Am 29.04.2016 um 15:56 schrieb Johan De Clercq:
> > I don;t think so : force_rport just adds the port on which you receive to the first via header.
> >
> > 2016-04-29 15:36 GMT+02:00 Julian Santer <julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net>
> > <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net>>>:
> >
> >    We are using 2.1.2
> >    So we made a "huge" version update and also changed the kind of working
> >
> >    Am 29.04.2016 um 14:27 schrieb Johan De Clercq:
> >
> >        What version do you use in your new install ?
> >
> >        2016-04-29 13:12 GMT+02:00 Julian Santer <julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net> <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net>>
> >        <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net> <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net>>>>:
> >
> >              Hi Johan,
> >
> >              we changed our platform 2 weeks ago from 1 OpenSips Proxy 1.6.4 to 3 OpenSips instances with topology hiding.
> >              Since we didn't have this problems earlier, I think it worked with the old platform.
> >              As we call force_rport() in the main_route, the private IP in the VIA header should be ignored, right?
> >              At the moment we call force_rport() in all our instances.
> >              I think, we should call force_rport() only on the edge server where we make the nat_handling, right?
> >
> >              Kind regards,
> >              Julian Santer
> >              Raiffeisen OnLIne
> >
> >
> >              Am 29.04.2016 um 10:10 schrieb Johan De Clercq:
> >
> >                  Indeed.
> >
> >
> >                  2016-04-29 9:49 GMT+02:00 Julian Santer <julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net> <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net>>
> >        <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net> <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net>>>
> >                  <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net> <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net>> <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net>
> >        <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net>>>>>:
> >
> >                      Hi Johan,
> >
> >                      as the asterisk is not administrated by us, I have to ask the customer.
> >                      As I understand you think the problem should be the private IP in the VIA header
> >                      and this should be fixed with STUN, right?
> >
> >                      Kind regards,
> >                      Julian Santer
> >                      Raiffeisen OnLine
> >
> >                      Am 29.04.2016 um 09:17 schrieb Johan De Clercq:
> >
> >                          do you use stun on the phones ?
> >
> >                          2016-04-29 9:14 GMT+02:00 Julian Santer <julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net>
> >        <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net>> <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net>
> >        <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net>>>
> >                  <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net> <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net>> <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net>
> >        <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net>>>>
> >                          <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net> <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net>>
> >        <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net> <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net>>>
> >        <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net> <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net>>
> >                  <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net> <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net <mailto:julian.santer at rolmail.net>>>>>>:
> >
> >                                Hi guys,
> >
> >                                we are using OpenSips 2.1.2 with topology_hiding.
> >                                Now we got trouble with Re-Invites, which are routed to the private IP from the "from".
> >                                The topology_hiding matches, but the Re-Invite is sent to the private IP from the "from".
> >                                Have we to call lookup again on the registrar/core, when we got a Re-Invite?
> >                                You can find the trace under http://siptrace.rolbox.net/siptrace.html <http://siptrace.rolbox.net/siptrace.html>
> >
> >                                Kind regards,
> >                                Julian Santer
> >                                Raiffeisen OnLine
> >
> >
> >                                _______________________________________________
> >                                Users mailing list
> >        Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org> <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>>
> >        <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org> <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>>>
> >                  <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org> <mailto:Users-ZwoEplunGu3gxA1m0aaAoQ at public.gmane.orgps.org <mailto:Users-ZwoEplunGu3gxA1m0aaAoQ at public.gmane.orgps.org>>
> >        <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org> <mailto:Users-ZwoEplunGu0fYbrseoN+Dx2eb7JE58TQ at public.gmane.org <mailto:Dx2eb7JE58TQ at public.gmane.org>>>>
> >                          <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
> >        <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>> <mailto:Users-ZwoEplunGu3gxA1m0aaAoQ at public.gmane.orgps.org <mailto:Users-ZwoEplunGu3gxA1m0aaAoQ at public.gmane.orgps.org>
> >        <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>>>
> >                  <mailto:Users-ZwoEplunGu1UUpeUK0L <mailto:Users-ZwoEplunGu1UUpeUK0L> <mailto:Users-ZwoEplunGu1UUpeUK0L
> >        <mailto:Users-ZwoEplunGu1UUpeUK0L>>/Pw at public.gmane.orgsips.org <mailto:Pw at public.gmane.orgsips.org>
> >        <mailto:Pw at public.gmane.orgsips.org <mailto:Pw at public.gmane.orgsips.org>>
> >                  <mailto:Pw at public.gmane.orgsips.org <mailto:Pw at public.gmane.orgsips.org> <mailto:Pw-XMD5yJDbdMTcBkidbGgD4Q at public.gmane.orggsips.org <mailto:Pw-XMD5yJDbdMTcBkidbGgD4Q at public.gmane.orggsips.org>>>>>
> >        http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users <http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users>
> 
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >                      _______________________________________________
> >                      Users mailing list
> >        Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org> <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>>
> >        <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org> <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>>>
> >                  <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org> <mailto:Users-ZwoEplunGu3gxA1m0aaAoQ at public.gmane.orgps.org <mailto:Users-ZwoEplunGu3gxA1m0aaAoQ at public.gmane.orgps.org>>
> >        <mailto:Users-ZwoEplunGu1UUpeUK0L <mailto:Users-ZwoEplunGu1UUpeUK0L>/Pw at public.gmane.orgsips.org <mailto:Pw at public.gmane.orgsips.org>
> >        <mailto:Pw at public.gmane.orgsips.org <mailto:Pw at public.gmane.orgsips.org>>>>
> >        http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users <http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >              _______________________________________________
> >              Users mailing list
> >        Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org> <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>>
> >        <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org> <mailto:Users-ZwoEplunGu1UUpeUK0L/Pw at public.gmane.orgsips.org <mailto:Pw at public.gmane.orgsips.org>>>
> >        http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users <http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >    _______________________________________________
> >    Users mailing list
> >    Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org> <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>>
> >    http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users <http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users <http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160503/7dc8ab3f/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Users mailing list