[OpenSIPS-Users] ACK after set_advertised_address contains wrong address in VIA header
bogdan at opensips.org
Mon Jun 27 16:41:08 CEST 2016
If you set the advertised host / port in branch route, it will have
impact over the entire transaction (all branches). So, any local replies
(CANCEL and ACK) that are constructed by OpenSIPS (for any branch) will
use the same set of advertised values. Which is of course wrong. Let us
come up with the fix (as idea and code).
Could you open a bug report on the GITHUB tracker, please ?
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
On 27.06.2016 15:45, Newlin, Ben wrote:
> I always set the advertised address in request route.
> Also as the original issue noted the second INVITE does go out with
> the correct advertised address in the VIA. It is only the local ACK
> for the failed second request that contains the wrong address in the
> VIA. So set_advertised_address appears to be working, but the local
> generated ACK is not using that address.
> Ben Newlin
> *From: *Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org>
> *Date: *Monday, June 27, 2016 at 5:37 AM
> *To: *"users at lists.opensips.org" <users at lists.opensips.org>, "Newlin,
> Ben" <Ben.Newlin at inin.com>
> *Subject: *Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] ACK after set_advertised_address
> contains wrong address in VIA header
> Hi Ben,
> Where in the script do you do the first advertise_address ? In the
> request route or in a branch route ?
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
> On 25.06.2016 03:41, Newlin, Ben wrote:
> I have run into the same problem that was described in this
> previous post , however it doesn’t appear it was ever solved at
> the time.
> I am using the dispatcher module to route calls to external
> carriers and I am using set_advertised_address to set the outgoing
> public address prior to sending the request. If the first
> destination returns failure, the ACK is sent correctly. Then I
> select a different destination and set a different public address
> using set_advertised_address. If this second call also fails, the
> ACK that is sent out uses the first advertised address, not the
> current on for the request.
> Has anyone figured this out? I am using 1.11.6.
>  http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/2014-August/029779.html
> Ben Newlin
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Users