[OpenSIPS-Users] WARNING:core:timer_ticker: timer task <uac_reg_check> already schedualed

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Artem,

In the uac_registrant DB, do you define registrar servers / outbound 
proxies using DNS (FQDN names) instead of IPs ?

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com

On 24.02.2016 02:50, Чалков Артём wrote:
> Hi all!
> My opensips version:
> opensips 2.1.2 (x86_64/linux)
> git revision: 44cc594
> I use opensips with uac_registrant module and sometimes in log appears 
> these warnings (2-3 warnings every hour):
> Feb 17 21:34:56 opensips-uac /usr/sbin/opensips[12971]: 
> WARNING:core:timer_ticker: timer task <uac_reg_check> already 
> schedualed for 62923880 ms (now 62924880 ms), itmay overlap..
> Timer offset leads me to approx. (with some little offset like 1-10 
> minutes) time, when my opensips restarting every day (via service 
> opensips restart).
> In particular rare cases (1-2 times in month or rarely) it leads to 
> flood with below warnings:
>
> Feb 17 21:59:36 opensips-uac /usr/sbin/opensips[12971]: 
> WARNING:core:timer_ticker: timer task <tm-timer> already schedualed 
> for 64393870 ms (now 64395870 ms), it may o
> verlap..
> Feb 17 21:59:36 opensips-uac /usr/sbin/opensips[12971]: 
> WARNING:core:utimer_ticker: utimer task <tm-utimer> already schedualed 
> for 64395870 ms (now 64395970 ms), it ma
> y overlap..
> Feb 17 21:59:36 opensips-uac /usr/sbin/opensips[12971]: 
> WARNING:core:utimer_ticker: utimer task <tm-utimer> already schedualed 
> for 64395970 ms (now 64396060 ms), it ma
> y overlap..
>
> But every time it happens, warnings with uac_reg_check appears 
> first in large quantities. While it happens, opensips starts to ignore 
> most incoming traffic. In log with debug=4 i doesn't see any unusual 
> entrys before it starts. After some time (2-3 hours) flood stops and 
> problem disappears itself without any workaround on my side.
>
> I know about similar issue with radius 
> (http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.voip.opensips.user/31415), but 
> i'm not using radius in my configuration, so can it be some new issue 
> or it is a same issue and it would be resolved, as planned, in v.2.2?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160225/5bf0630a/attachment.htm>