[OpenSIPS-Users] send_reply vs t_reply
bogdan at opensips.org
Thu Jul 2 19:36:52 CEST 2015
nothing :) ....as the transaction state machine does not "see" any
stateless replies you send from script.
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
On 02.07.2015 19:20, Podrigal, Aron wrote:
> What happens if within a transaction one sends a stateless reply with
> sl_send_reply() ?
> On Jul 2, 2015 10:18 AM, "Bogdan-Andrei Iancu" <bogdan at opensips.org
> <mailto:bogdan at opensips.org>> wrote:
> Hi Aron,
> send_reply() is a wrapper over t_reply() and sl_send_reply(). Both
> functions do the same, but first is doing it transaction stateful,
> while the second in a stateless way (no transaction state).
> send_reply() simply checks if a transaction was already created
> (like via t_newtran() ) and calls further the right function.
> Best regards,
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
> On 30.06.2015 19:35, Podrigal, Aron wrote:
>> I would like to get some details on the difference if one uses
>> send_reply or t_reply for a sip message.
>> Is there any major differences where the reply sent from, and
>> what function is used?
>> Thank you.
>> Aron Podrigal
>> //Be happy :-)
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Users