[OpenSIPS-Users] General Architecture opinion needed

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi John,

Why do you need the B2B part ?  And answering your questions:

1) B2B is not dialog dependent, but TM only, so there is no risk

2) It will be more difficult to have them in B2B than in proxy - those 
features are more proxy oriented.

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com

On 26.12.2014 11:25, John Nash wrote:
> I am trying to make full SBC using mostly opensips components.The call 
> flow will be like diagram below..
> For features like concurrent call limit, call timeout, CDR accounting 
> I will have to use dialog module in main opensips proxy. For B2bua if 
> I understand correctly I will have to use another instance. My doubts 
> are ..
>
> 1- Since B2bua is dependent on dialog module this architecture will 
> create dialog twice in shared database (Plan to use real time DB mode 
> for persistence and display of ongoing calls in real time). Can this 
> redundant work be avoided?
>
> 2- Can concurrent call limit, Session timeout (Prepaid), CDR 
> accounting be implemented at b2bua instance and leaving proxy free of 
> this burden?
>
>
>
> Inline image 1
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150106/8a586150/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 4326 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150106/8a586150/attachment.png>