[OpenSIPS-Users] Fwd: Opensips + RtpProxy: media stream timed out while starting

[Semen Golubcov]

P.S. Here i was calling bob from alex on my own system, so both clients are
using my own ip.

2015-02-15 2:42 GMT+02:00 Semen Golubcov <thegolub4 at gmail.com>:

> Hello Eric. I captured the trace with the siptrace module, since it's
> easier to capture tls packets with it. I hope it will do as good as ngrep.
> Here it is:
>
> https://gist.github.com/anonymous/a9046cddd1058cf9ea35
>
>
>
> 2015-02-14 5:26 GMT+02:00 Eric Tamme <eric at uphreak.com>:
>
>> Or you could uh... Use UDP 5060/till you get your signalling sorted.  ;)
>> On Feb 13, 2015, at 7:23 PM, Semen Golubcov <thegolub4 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> You mean 5061? The packets are encrypted, i will try to capture them
>>> with ngrep and decrypt with the private key using wireshark and post the
>>> decrypted data to
>>> gist.
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Eric Tamme <eric at uphreak.com>
>>> Date: 2015-02-14 3:47 GMT+02:00
>>> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips + RtpProxy: media stream timed
>>> out while starting
>>> To: OpenSIPS users mailling list <users at lists.opensips.org>
>>>
>>>
>>> The message about late back means it is probably not routing.
>>>
>>> Install ngrep and run
>>>
>>> ngrep -qtd any -W byline port 5060
>>>
>>> On OpenSIPS during the call.  Paste the output to a gist on
>>> gist.github.com and include the link in your next reply.
>>>
>>> -Eric
>>> On Feb 13, 2015, at 6:19 PM, Semen Golubcov <thegolub4 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello. Should i answer you here or send my replies to the user list?
>>>>
>>>> I looked up the sip trace and syslog, apparently there are no
>>>> retransmissions i think and there is no messages about "no matching
>>>> transaction exists".
>>>>
>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>> DBG:core:parse_msg:  method:  <ACK>
>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>> DBG:core:parse_msg:  uri:     <sip:53049768 at 92.xx.xx.xx(my_Public_ip
>>>> (client) ):49190;transport=tls>
>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>> DBG:core:parse_msg:  version: <SIP/2.0>
>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>> DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=2
>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>> DBG:core:parse_via_param: found param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=6
>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>> DBG:core:parse_via_param: found param type 232, <branch> =
>>>> <z9hG4bKPjb29aaf78cf594541aeb97e0b801a4075>; state=6
>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>> DBG:core:parse_via_param: found param type 237, <alias> = <n/a>; state=16
>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>> DBG:core:parse_via: end of header reached, state=5
>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>> DBG:core:parse_headers: via found, flags=2
>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>> DBG:core:parse_headers: this is the first via
>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>> DBG:core:receive_msg: After parse_msg...
>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>> DBG:core:receive_msg: preparing to run routing scripts...
>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>> DBG:sl:sl_filter_ACK: to late to be a local ACK!
>>>>
>>>> In this example i was calling calling from one user to another on my
>>>> machine (so the ip will always be the same for both clients). I guess here:
>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>> DBG:core:parse_msg:  method:  <ACK>
>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>> DBG:core:parse_msg:  uri:     <sip:53049768 at 92.xx.xx.xx(my_Public_ip
>>>> (client) ):49190;transport=tls>
>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>> DBG:core:parse_msg:  version: <SIP/2.0>
>>>> Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]:
>>>> DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=2
>>>>
>>>> The server get's the ack from my client, and than opensips says:
>>>>
>>>> "Apr  5 23:06:22 ser /usr/local/sbin/ser[6282]: DEBUG : sl_filter_ACK:
>>>> to
>>>> late to be a local ACK!"
>>>>
>>>> Does this mean that ACK is getting lost? I'll attach the syslog just in
>>>> case.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150215/355d4e4c/attachment.htm>