[OpenSIPS-Users] URGENT! uac_registrant:run_reg_tm_cback: failed to parse Contact body

Sat Sep 13 03:16:22 CEST 2014

But if i configure same account on my SIP phone it works! why it is
misbehaving with Opensips?

SIP provide will argue if it works with SIP phone then it should work with
all devices.

On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Ovidiu Sas <osas at voipembedded.com> wrote:

> You need to tell your provider to fix this.
>
> Regards,
> Ovidiu Sas
> On Sep 12, 2014 4:49 PM, "Satish Patel" <satish.txt at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> What is the solution? do i need to tell my SIP provide or i should do
>> something at Opensips side?
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Ovidiu Sas <osas at voipembedded.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The contact header is malformed:
>>> Contact: <<sip:73757799 at 182.xx.xx.xx.xx:5060>transport=UDP>;q=1;expires=98;received="sip:182.xx.xx.xx.xx:5060",
>>> <<sip:7777 at 182.xx.xx.xx.xx
>>> :5060>transport=UDP>;q=1;expires=300;received="sip:182.xx.xx.xx.xx:5060"
>>>
>>> See the double '<'.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Ovidiu Sas
>>> On Sep 12, 2014 4:37 PM, "Satish Patel" <satish.txt at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Here is the trace, so where is the problem?
>>>>
>>>> #
>>>> U 182.xx.xx.xx.xx:5060 -> 216.xx.xx.xx.xx:5060
>>>> REGISTER sip:sip.example.com:5060 SIP/2.0.
>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 182.xx.xx.xx.xx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK60e.9f8b83d3.0.
>>>> To: sip:73757799 at sip.example.com:5060.
>>>> From: <sip:73757799 at sip.example.com:5060>;tag=40aeb.
>>>> CSeq: 2 REGISTER.
>>>> Call-ID: e6a44cb93fd53890295e3cecfed.
>>>> Max-Forwards: 70.
>>>> Content-Length: 0.
>>>> User-Agent: OpenSIPS (1.12.0dev-notls (x86_64/linux)).
>>>> Contact: <sip:7777 at 182.xx.xx.xx.xx>transport=UDP;expires=300.
>>>> Authorization: Digest username="73757799", realm="sip.example.com",
>>>> nonce="VBNMPFQTSxBkZqUtsDCom023iuZ2evbn", uri="sip:sip.example.com:5060",
>>>> qop=auth, nc=00000001, cnonce="220797507",
>>>> response="8149149a7b11826e409d2954a35939d1", algorithm=MD5.
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> #
>>>> U 216.xx.xx.xx.xx:5060 -> 182.xx.xx.xx.xx:5060
>>>> SIP/2.0 200 OK.
>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 182.xx.xx.xx.xx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK60e.9f8b83d3.0.
>>>> To: sip:73757799 at sip.example.com:5060
>>>> ;tag=28f708707fdbe632f4ca1ebbf5e1be15-5a71.
>>>> From: <sip:73757799 at sip.example.com:5060>;tag=40aeb.
>>>> CSeq: 2 REGISTER.
>>>> Call-ID: e6a44cb93fd53890295e3cecfed.
>>>> Contact: <<sip:73757799 at 182.xx.xx.xx.xx:5060>transport=UDP>;q=1;expires=98;received="sip:182.xx.xx.xx.xx:5060",
>>>> <<sip:7777 at 182.xx.xx.xx.xx
>>>> :5060>transport=UDP>;q=1;expires=300;received="sip:182.xx.xx.xx.xx:5060".
>>>> Content-Length: 0.
>>>>
>>>> #
>>>> U 216.xx.xx.xx.xx:5060 -> 182.xx.xx.xx.xx:5060
>>>> OPTIONS sip:182.xx.xx.xx.xx:5060 SIP/2.0.
>>>> Max-Forwards: 10.
>>>> Record-Route: <sip:216.xx.xx.xx.xx;lr>.
>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>> 216.xx.xx.xx.xx;branch=z9hG4bK3e46.e72ab63026fa3572f78124328a048c26.0.
>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 70.xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060;branch=0.
>>>> Route: <sip:216.xx.xx.xx.xx;lr;received='sip:182.xx.xx.xx.xx:5060'>.
>>>> From: sip:ping at invalid;tag=5ba30f69.
>>>> To: sip:182.xx.xx.xx.xx:5060.
>>>> Call-ID: 0c26e475-b1d63378-dc72c58 at 70.xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.
>>>> CSeq: 1 OPTIONS.
>>>> Content-Length: 0.
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> #
>>>> U 182.xx.xx.xx.xx:5060 -> 216.xx.xx.xx.xx:5060
>>>> SIP/2.0 484 Address Incomplete.
>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>> 216.xx.xx.xx.xx;received=216.xx.xx.xx.xx;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK3e46.e72ab63026fa3572f78124328a048c26.0.
>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 70.xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060;branch=0.
>>>> From: sip:ping at invalid;tag=5ba30f69.
>>>> To: sip:182.xx.xx.xx.xx:5060;tag=c223d9b6a566b5450d01aad8764c61fe.b26e.
>>>> Call-ID: 0c26e475-b1d63378-dc72c58 at 70.xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.
>>>> CSeq: 1 OPTIONS.
>>>> Server: OpenSIPS (1.12.0dev-notls (x86_64/linux)).
>>>> Content-Length: 0.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Ovidiu Sas <osas at voipembedded.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Take a look at RFC3261:
>>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3261#section-10.2
>>>>>   Contact: REGISTER requests MAY contain a Contact header field with
>>>>> zero or more values containing address bindings.
>>>>>
>>>>> The error that you have is related to the Contact header in the reply.
>>>>> Check the reply received from the registrar.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Ovidiu Sas
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Satish Patel <satish.txt at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > In logs i am getting this error
>>>>> >
>>>>> > ERROR:uac_registrant:run_reg_tm_cback: failed to parse Contact body
>>>>> >
>>>>> > AOR:: sip:9999 at sip.example.com:5060 expires=300
>>>>> >         state:: INTERNAL_ERROR_STATE
>>>>> >         last_register_sent:: Sat Sep 13 00:30:28 2014
>>>>> >         registration_t_out:: Sat Sep 13 00:35:28 2014
>>>>> >         registrar:: sip:sip.example.com:5060
>>>>> >         binding:: sip:9999 at 182.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060
>>>>> >         dst_IP:: IPv4 ip=sip.example.com
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I have one more gateway which is asterisk one working fine, what is
>>>>> the
>>>>> > binding_URI?
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>> > Users mailing list
>>>>> > Users at lists.opensips.org
>>>>> > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> VoIP Embedded, Inc.
>>>>> http://www.voipembedded.com
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Users mailing list
>>>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>>>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Users mailing list
>>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20140912/ba974c8a/attachment-0001.htm>