[OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 1.9.1 and NAT

dpa denis7979 at mail.ru
Tue Nov 26 05:40:07 CET 2013


“What is it that you are trying to do?”

 

I try to check if message came from behind NAT or not and make some actions
depending on result of checking.

To speak the truth I tried to include in opensips.cfg logic about direction
of the call.

 

What I thought. I thought that nat_bflag activated only after lookup()
function processing, i.e. when call goes TO UAC behind NAT and NOT activated
when call came FROM UAC behind NAT. So in onreply route I make the test
about this flag and waiting (in my current case) that the test of natb_flag
will be failed.

 

 

From: users-bounces at lists.opensips.org
[mailto:users-bounces at lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Ali Pey
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:16 AM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 1.9.1 and NAT

 

As I said earlier, there is no such a thing as FROM or TO (i.e. direction)
unless it's implemented in your logic. When a SIP request reaches the IP
address of your opensips server, it goes through your routing script in
opensips.cfg and then it's routed out. What you have there, it would apply
to the request message. Put yourself in opensips shoes and follow the logic
- that's how we debugged code while at uni :)

 

If you have a concept of direction and you need different behavior based on
your concept of direction, you need to implement it in your logic. For
instance you can examine the source IP or subnet to decide if this message
is from internal or external and then apply different logic to it - or
whatever else that is specific to your environment. 

 

What is it that you are trying to do?

 

Regards,

Ali Pey

 

 

On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:52 PM, dpa <denis7979 at mail.ru> wrote:

OK, but in the current case another question.

Is nat_bflag appear in transaction when call goes TO uac behind nat (by
using lookup(), for example), or it appears  in transaction when call goes
FROM uac behind nat?

 

Thank you.

 

From: users-bounces at lists.opensips.org
[mailto:users-bounces at lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Ali Pey
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 8:38 PM


To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 1.9.1 and NAT

 

You also examining isbflagset(10). Isn't that set?

 

Regards,

Ali Pey

 

On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 3:09 AM, dpa <denis7979 at mail.ru> wrote:

Hello

 

I understand but in onreply route I make a test: nat_uac_test("55") and only
if it successful I make “fix_nated_contact()”.

In my case nat_uac_test("55") must be fail after checking 183 ringing and
200 OK.

 

From: users-bounces at lists.opensips.org
[mailto:users-bounces at lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Ali Pey
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 5:37 PM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips 1.9.1 and NAT

 

Hello,

 

The question is not quite clear. In your opensips.cfg you call
"fix_nated_contact()" on both route and reply route. that's why it changes
the route.

 

There is no such a thing as direction in opensips unless it's implemented in
your logic. A message goes through your route or reply route scripts when it
reaches opensips. 

 

Regards,

Ali

 

On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 1:10 AM, dpa <denis7979 at mail.ru> wrote:



Hello

 

I have a one question about nat processing of Opensips.

 

There is such scheme

 

UAC1 (softphone behind nat) à Opensips -> UAC2 (another softswitch), i.e.
UAC1 initiates a call to Opensips and a signaling port = 5068.

 

So UAC2 becomes “ringing” by sending 183 message.

 

In attachment 183 message from UAC2 and some parts of opensips.cfg

 

After 183 processing by Opensips port in Contact header of 183 (and later
200 OK) messages become 5060, i.e. Opensips detects NAT and changes Contact
header.

 

So my question is, Why does Opensips changes Contact header?

Once Opensips detects nat transaction (setting setflag(21)) is it check all
reply messages (and doesn`t matter from which UAC they have been received)
or Opensips can detect direction and makes decision about nat process?

 

Thank you  for any help.

 

 

 

 

 


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users at lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

 


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users at lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

 


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users at lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

 

 
<https://contactmonkey.com/api/v1/tracker?cm_session=f72377a2-cbd9-408f-98ea
-b3dc9fc53d76&cm_type=open&cm_user_email=alipey at gmail.com> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20131126/a9109761/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 906 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20131126/a9109761/attachment-0001.gif>


More information about the Users mailing list