[OpenSIPS-Users] B2B issue with UPDATE message

[duane.larson at gmail.com]

Thanks for looking at this.




On , Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at opensips.org> wrote:






> Thanks, got the info I need - I have a start, need to investigate
> bit more on UPDATE handling. I will come up with a fix for you.



> Regards,

> Bogdan



> On 03/23/2012 05:09 PM, Duane Larson wrote:
> Ok



> Patched dlg.c to look like this





> b2b_dlg_t* b2b_search_htable_next_dlg(b2b_dlg_t* start_dlg,
> b2b_table table, unsigned int hash_index,

> unsigned int local_index, str* to_tag, str*
> from_tag, str* callid)

> {

> b2b_dlg_t* dlg;

> str dlg_from_tag={NULL, 0};

> dlg_leg_t* leg;



> LM_DBG("entering with start=%p, table=%p, hash=%i,
> label=%i \n",

> start_dlg,table,hash_index,local_index);

> if(callid)

> LM_DBG("searching callid %d[%.*s]\n",
> callid->len,callid->len, callid->s);

> if(to_tag)

> LM_DBG("searching totag %d[%.*s]\n",
> to_tag->len,to_tag->len, to_tag->s);

> if(from_tag)

> LM_DBG("searching fromtag %d[%.*s]\n",
> from_tag->len,from_tag->len, from_tag->s);

> dlg= start_dlg?start_dlg->next:table[hash_index].first;

> while(dlg)

> {





> And here is the debug output and an NGREP of the call



> http://pastebin.com/ZiQsQj5r



> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 6:19 AM,
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bogdan at opensips.org>
> wrote:

> Hi Duane,



> Strange, the logs shows that the UPDATE did not actually
> match, while the BYE did...



> Could you please retake the test (same debug=4) while using
> the attached patch - the patch is just for printing more info
> related to matching.



> Thanks and regards,

> Bogdan





> On 03/22/2012 06:24 PM, duane.larson at gmail.com
> wrote:


> Here is a debug and the NGREP that goes along with it.



> http://pastebin.com/DuDKUrGd











> On , Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bogdan at opensips.org>
> wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Hi Duane,

> >

> >

> >

> > Could please re-run the scenario with opensips in
> full debug

> > (debug=4) and and post somewhere the logs
> corresponding to UPDATE

> > and BYE processing ?

> >

> >

> >

> > Thanks and regards,

> >

> > Bogdan

> >

> >

> >

> > On 03/22/2012 03:46 AM, duane.larson at gmail.com
> wrote:

> > I am seeing the following issue

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > One of OpenSIPS users makes an outbound call
> through a SIP

> > carrier. This gets sent to my OpenSIPS B2BUA which
> then sends it

> > to the SIP carrier. The calls length makes it to 30
> minutes and

> > then it is killed.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > I see that the SIP carrier at around the 30 minute
> mark is sending

> > an UPDATE message to the client but for some reason
> when the

> > OpenSIPS B2BUA sees this UPDATE message it doesn't
> think it is

> > apart of the current dialog. So then the SIP
> carrier sends a BYE

> > because it never got a reply back for the UPDATE.
> The OpenSIPS

> > B2BUA has no problem recognizing the BYE message as
> being apart of

> > the Dialog and sends this over to the OpenSIPS
> user. Am I doing

> > something wrong?

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > _______________________________________________

> > Users mailing list

> > Users at lists.opensips.org

> > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

> >

> >

> >

> >












> --
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
> http://www.opensips-solutions.com




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120323/3e299d83/attachment.htm>