[OpenSIPS-Users] RabbitMQ functionality question

[Pete Kelly]

Hi

Yes this module would be really useful for us if the VHost / exchange /
routing key could be specified independently for the messages sent.

Maybe the routing key could be the message name in the raise event? e.g.
E_PIKE_BLOCKED ?

On 30 November 2011 12:20, Razvan Crainea <razvancrainea at opensips.org>wrote:

>  Hi, Pete!
>
> Yes, indeed the RabbitMQ currently uses the same value for the exchange
> name and routing key. Also only the '/' vhost can be used for the moment,
> as it is hardcoded in the code. But this module is still under development
> and any new ideas are welcome.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Răzvan Crainea
> OpenSIPS Developer
>
>
> On 11/30/2011 01:52 PM, Pete Kelly wrote:
>
> Hi
>
>  I have a question about the RabbitMQ functionality.
>
>  The documentation states that the 'exchange' will also be used as the
> 'queue' used in RabbitMQ.
>
>  In my experience you do not send messages directly to a queue in
> RabbitMQ, you send message which contains
>
>  - exchange name
> - routing key
> - message payload
>
>
>  RabbitMQ then uses the routing key to route the message to the correct
> queue (or onward exchange).
>
>  Can you tell me if the RabbitMQ implementation supports this, as it
> sounds like it does not currently... it seems it uses the exchange as the
> routing key as well as exchange?
>
>  Pete
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing listUsers at lists.opensips.orghttp://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20111130/159ff093/attachment.htm>