[OpenSIPS-Users] Dialog Ping
Vlad Paiu
vladpaiu at opensips.org
Thu Jul 14 17:17:01 CEST 2011
Hello,
Glad to see that it has worked.
I see that the To and From headers are different in the generated pings,
sip:90133X9XX8 at irock.com <mailto:sip%3A90133X9XX8 at irock.com> vs
sip:933X9XX8 at irock.com <mailto:sip%3A933X9XX8 at irock.com> .
Are you using uac_replace_to/uac_replace_from to mangled the To and From
headers, or how are you manipulating the headers ?
Regards,
--
Vlad Paiu
OpenSIPS Developer
On 07/14/2011 06:01 PM, Duane Larson wrote:
> That fix did fix my issue. This is what I am seeing now and I am
> guessing this could be an issue. Figure it might have something to do
> with the fact that I change the To: and From: headers maybe?
> U 2011/07/14 09:55:01.570108 173.XXX.XXX.107:5060 ->
> 64.132.245.122:15073 <http://64.132.245.122:15073>
> OPTIONS sip:drnahsqf at 64.132.245.122:15073
> <http://sip:drnahsqf@64.132.245.122:15073> SIP/2.0.
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 173.XXX.XXX.107;branch=z9hG4bK40f.8ea107f4.0.
> To: <sip:90127X2XX9 at irock.com
> <mailto:sip%3A90127X2XX9 at irock.com>>;tag=6mZ.hX2A2HzZ2j99ttSvNxStBLVnzI4n.
> From: <sip:933X9XX8 at irock.com
> <mailto:sip%3A933X9XX8 at irock.com>>;tag=f55753a702964d54babd04143f8f831d.
> CSeq: 1 OPTIONS.
> Call-ID: AZ9B9EO4ZJo58X9UyZWv-pzeD7nyQaiM.
> Content-Length: 0.
> User-Agent: OpenSIPS (1.8.0-dev0-notls (x86_64/linux)).
> .
> #
> U 2011/07/14 09:55:01.570159 173.XXX.XXX.107:5060 ->
> 64.132.245.122:15052 <http://64.132.245.122:15052>
> OPTIONS sip:mckldeuz at 64.132.245.122:15052
> <http://sip:mckldeuz@64.132.245.122:15052> SIP/2.0.
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 173.XXX.XXX.107;branch=z9hG4bKc3b7.c0c22472.0.
> To: <sip:90133X9XX8 at irock.com
> <mailto:sip%3A90133X9XX8 at irock.com>>;tag=f55753a702964d54babd04143f8f831d.
> From: <sip:90127X2XX9 at irock.com
> <mailto:sip%3A90127X2XX9 at irock.com>>;tag=6mZ.hX2A2HzZ2j99ttSvNxStBLVnzI4n.
> CSeq: 31012 OPTIONS.
> Call-ID: AZ9B9EO4ZJo58X9UyZWv-pzeD7nyQaiM.
> Content-Length: 0.
> User-Agent: OpenSIPS (1.8.0-dev0-notls (x86_64/linux)).
> .
> #
> U 2011/07/14 09:55:01.604366 64.132.245.122:15073
> <http://64.132.245.122:15073> -> 173.XXX.XXX.107:5060
> SIP/2.0 500 Unhandled by dialog usages.
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 173.XXX.XXX.107;received=173.XXX.XXX.107;branch=z9hG4bK40f.8ea107f4.0.
> Call-ID: AZ9B9EO4ZJo58X9UyZWv-pzeD7nyQaiM.
> From: <sip:933X9XX8 at irock.com
> <mailto:sip%3A933X9XX8 at irock.com>>;tag=f55753a702964d54babd04143f8f831d.
> To: <sip:90127X2XX9 at irock.com
> <mailto:sip%3A90127X2XX9 at irock.com>>;tag=6mZ.hX2A2HzZ2j99ttSvNxStBLVnzI4n.
> CSeq: 1 OPTIONS.
> Server: Blink 0.24.1 (MacOSX).
> Content-Length: 0.
> .
> #
> U 2011/07/14 09:55:01.607154 64.132.245.122:15052
> <http://64.132.245.122:15052> -> 173.XXX.XXX.107:5060
> SIP/2.0 500 Unhandled by dialog usages.
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 173.XXX.XXX.107;received=173.XXX.XXX.107;branch=z9hG4bKc3b7.c0c22472.0.
> Call-ID: AZ9B9EO4ZJo58X9UyZWv-pzeD7nyQaiM.
> From: <sip:90127X2XX9 at irock.com
> <mailto:sip%3A90127X2XX9 at irock.com>>;tag=6mZ.hX2A2HzZ2j99ttSvNxStBLVnzI4n.
> To: <sip:90133X9XX8 at irock.com
> <mailto:sip%3A90133X9XX8 at irock.com>>;tag=f55753a702964d54babd04143f8f831d.
> CSeq: 31012 OPTIONS.
> Server: Blink 0.2.7 (Windows).
> Content-Length: 0.
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Vlad Paiu <vladpaiu at opensips.org
> <mailto:vladpaiu at opensips.org>> wrote:
>
> Hello Brett,
>
> In 1.6.x the dialog could have also been created by setting a flag
> from the script, but this was dropped in 1.7.0.
>
> Quite a few modules used the Dialog internal API to create dialogs
> on their own, like trace_dialog() in Siptrace, engage_rtp_proxy()
> in RTPProxy, or even the ACC module when generating CDRs.
>
> The latest commit should fix all of these issues, where the dialog
> was created internally by a function called from the script, and
> pinging or automatic timeout would have been skipped.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Vlad Paiu
> OpenSIPS Developer
>
>
>
> On 07/14/2011 05:43 PM, Brett Nemeroff wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Vlad Paiu <vladpaiu at opensips.org
>> <mailto:vladpaiu at opensips.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Duane,
>>
>> Just took a look at your config.
>> What was happening is that you were first calling
>> trace_dialog(), which creates the dialog structure
>> internally. When the call to create_dialog("PpB") came later
>> on, it already found that the dialog was created and did not
>> set the needed flags for pinging.
>>
>>
>> Nice catch here...
>>
>> Are there any other "automatic dialog creation" methods that
>> might interfere with the dialog creation flags being set?
>>
>> -Brett
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> *--*--*--*--*--*
> Duane
> *--*--*--*--*--*
> --
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110714/d1144967/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Users
mailing list