[OpenSIPS-Users] SIP Presence Aggregation Issue

[Adrian Georgescu]

Hi Klaus,

Many thanks!

Adrian

On May 20, 2010, at 6:48 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:

> Hi Adrian!
> 
> I just tested with A1 communicator (a branded Bria) and A1oIP service (unfortunately I do not know the vendor of the presence server).
> 
> Scenario:
> 
> A1 >---PUBLISH--\
>                Presence Server>--NOTIFY--> B
> A2 >---PUBLISH--/
> 
> 
> A1 is available, A2 is "offline":
> 
> XML document sent to B:
> 
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
> <presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf" xmlns:ci="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid" xmlns:dm="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model" xmlns:lt="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:location-type" xmlns:r="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid" entity="sip:foobar at a1.net">
> <tuple id="tc66deb3a">
> 	<status>
> 		<basic>closed</basic>
> 	</status>
> 	<timestamp>2010-05-20T15:29:05Z</timestamp>
> </tuple>
> 
> <tuple id="t096a4143">
> 	<status>
> 		<basic>open</basic>
> 	</status>
> 	<timestamp>2010-05-20T15:22:51Z</timestamp>
> </tuple>
> <dm:person id="p751bb06a">
> 	<dm:note>Offline</dm:note>
> 	<dm:timestamp>2010-05-20T15:29:05Z</dm:timestamp>
> </dm:person>
> 
> <dm:person id="p2a1d2439">
> 	<r:activities>
> 		<r:busy/>
> 	</r:activities>
> 	<dm:note>Busy</dm:note>
> 	<dm:timestamp>2010-05-20T15:22:51Z</dm:timestamp>
> </dm:person>
> </presence>
> 
> 
> 
> Rendering of the 2 tuples by A1 communicator: see screenshot
> The icon is green (available), but the word "offline" is added.
> 
> 
> regards
> Klaus
> 
> 
> Am 11.05.2010 17:48, schrieb Adrian Georgescu:
>> I could not figure out any differences in signaling or XCAP between latest Bria and previous Eyebeam.
>> 
>> They seem to be the same software with a different skin.
>> 
>> Adrian
>> 
>> On May 11, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>> 
>>> Anca, I recently found out that there is a beta of X-Lite 4.0 which
>>> looks like as it is based on Bria. I have not tested it, but you may
>>> want to give it a try.
>>> http://www.counterpath.com/x-lite-download.html
>>> 
>>> regards
>>> Klaus
>>> 
>>> Am 11.05.2010 11:20, schrieb Anca Vamanu:
>>>> Klaus Darilion wrote:
>>>>> Am 01.04.2010 16:30, schrieb Adrian Georgescu:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Apr 1, 2010, at 3:10 PM, Schumann Sebastian wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi Bogdan
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Yes, in an "ideal world", this re-publishing with BUSY and ONLINE is
>>>>>>> wanted, but the toggling not. Priorities would help (you'd receive
>>>>>>> that but not trigger anything on the user interface as the highest
>>>>>>> priority will keep its state), but we don't have them yet, so in
>>>>>>> that case the decision must be made somewhere else or not at all.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> All we need is a good client to figure out how to use these concepts,
>>>>>> right?
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regarding clients:
>>>>> 
>>>>> AFAIK Microsoft's Communicator SUBSCRIBEs its own presence and as soon
>>>>> as you manually set the status on one of your clients, all other clients
>>>>> will change its state too.
>>>>> 
>>>>> And there is the A1 Communicator (a branded Bria softphone) which
>>>>> displays an aggregated state, e.g. if a buddy is online with 2 clients,
>>>>> one sending "online", one sending "offline", you will see something like
>>>>> "online (offline)" on the buddy list.
>>>>> 
>>>>> regards
>>>>> klaus
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> Hi Klaus,
>>>> 
>>>> Bria - CounterPath? It's a very good piece of information and if so I
>>>> could test this while at SIPIT as counterpath is bringing bria there.
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> <a1communicator-online-offline2.gif>