[OpenSIPS-Users] Matching problem in dialog module

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bogdan at voice-system.ro
Mon Feb 1 14:53:21 CET 2010


Ok Brian - everything is done, please update from SVN and give it a try.

Regards,
Bogdan

opensipslist at encambio.com wrote:
> Hi Bogdan,
>
> An lun., févr 01, 2010, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu schrieb:
>   
>> opensipslist at encambio.com wrote:
>>     
>>> An mer., janv 27, 2010, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu schrieb:
>>>       
>>>> opensipslist at encambio.com wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> An sam., janv 23, 2010, opensipslist at encambio.com schrieb:
>>>>>           
>>>>>> I send a INVITE over TLS and it is routed properly (I can call
>>>>>> normally.) The validate_dialog() is failing to match routesets.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>> By the way, I've tried all three possible dlg_match_mode modes,
>>>>> and I've tried using create_dialog() instead of set_flag(dlg_flag).
>>>>> Every time I see the error that the route check failed.
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> Let me run some tests on this scenario (with proto changing).
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> I see from revision 6550 that you found some problem with dialog
>>> matching and routeset comparisons. Do you recommend that we test
>>> your changes, or is there some reason you've not written about it
>>> on the mailing list?
>>>
>>>       
>> I'm still running some tests on it to be sure everything is ok.
>>
>>     
> Oh, that's why. I'll wait until you give the go ahead.
>
>   
>>> Also, the two comments of revision 6550 don't indicate if the
>>> correction to routeset comparison is dependent on the new RR API
>>> extension (reporting the number of lr removed routes.)
>>>
>>>       
>> both are related to the fix - dialog module needed some more info
>>     
> >from RR in order to do a correct Route checking.
>   
>>> Is it safe to build OpenSIPS with only the dialog routeset checking
>>> correction and not the RR API extension?
>>>
>>>       
>> no - dialog will not compile anymore - update both.
>>
>>     
> Okay.
>
>   
>>> If these two comments describe independent changes, it might have
>>> been a better idea to make two different SCN revisions. I can't
>>> figure out which changes to test for the dialog routeset checking.
>>>
>>>       
>> not the case.... one commit, one fix :)
>>
>>     
> That's good, I should have known better. Thanks for the correction,
> related RR API addition, and testing as well. Good luck with that.
>
> Regards,
> Brian
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>   


-- 
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
www.voice-system.ro




More information about the Users mailing list