[OpenSIPS-Users] Shared 'location' table?

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Chris,

A quick one - with such a configuration, the NAT traversal will not work 
(due the restriction on destination of the NAT pinhole) - so why pinging 
them ?....

I can make a small patch to you to set nathelper for pinging only if the 
record socket is local, if not, no pinging - this may solve the pinging 
problem, but overall, it will make no difference I guess.

Regards,
Bogdan

Chris Maciejewski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I made a diagram showing what I am trying to achieve:
>
> http://wima.co.uk/2x_opensips.pdf
>
> Is this possible at all?
> Can we make two OpenSIPs share the same 'location' table, yet each
> dealing only with it's "own" contacts?
>
> Regards,
> Chris
>
>
> On 22 April 2010 18:47, Brett Nemeroff <brett at nemeroff.com> wrote:
>   
>> Just a quick question here.. can some of this be taken care of with a
>> t_replicate for the register?
>>
>> Just a thought..
>> -Brett
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Chris Maciejewski <chris at wima.co.uk> wrote:
>>     
>>> On 22 April 2010 18:11, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at voice-system.ro> wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Chris Maciejewski wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> On 22 April 2010 18:00, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at voice-system.ro> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> running 2 opensips with different IPs ? because opensips saves in
>>>>>> location table its own socket (where the REGISTER was received), and if
>>>>>> the other server will try to use it, it will not recognize this socket
>>>>>> (as it is a different IP).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Before going further, note that multiple opensips  sharing  the same
>>>>>> location table has some flows (due how SIP works) - like if you are
>>>>>> using multiple interfaces, of different port ; also NAT traversal will
>>>>>> not work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the end, if you do not have NAT and using a single interface, you can
>>>>>> simply ignore those warnings.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Bogdan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>> Hi Bogdan,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for clarification. I am aware due to NAT traversal etc.
>>>>> multiple SIP registrar servers sharing the same location table will
>>>>> not work.
>>>>>
>>>>> I was just worried this WARNINGs might have some negative impact, but
>>>>> in that case I will just ignore them.
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> If opensips finds a non-local socket in a usrloc records, it will fire
>>>> the warning and use one of its own sockets for dealing with that contact.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Bogdan
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> Ah, I see now.
>>>
>>> When UA1 registered at Proxy1 only, Nathelper OPTIONs are sent from
>>> both Proxy1 and Proxy2. This is not what I wanted :(
>>>
>>> Is there any way to make Proxy2 completely ignore UA1?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Chris
>>>
>>>       
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>   


-- 
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
www.voice-system.ro