[OpenSIPS-Users] Shared 'location' table?

[Brett Nemeroff]

Just a quick question here.. can some of this be taken care of with a
t_replicate for the register?

Just a thought..
-Brett


On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Chris Maciejewski <chris at wima.co.uk> wrote:
> On 22 April 2010 18:11, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at voice-system.ro> wrote:
>> Chris Maciejewski wrote:
>>> On 22 April 2010 18:00, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at voice-system.ro> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>
>>>> running 2 opensips with different IPs ? because opensips saves in
>>>> location table its own socket (where the REGISTER was received), and if
>>>> the other server will try to use it, it will not recognize this socket
>>>> (as it is a different IP).
>>>>
>>>> Before going further, note that multiple opensips  sharing  the same
>>>> location table has some flows (due how SIP works) - like if you are
>>>> using multiple interfaces, of different port ; also NAT traversal will
>>>> not work.
>>>>
>>>> In the end, if you do not have NAT and using a single interface, you can
>>>> simply ignore those warnings.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Bogdan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Bogdan,
>>>
>>> Thanks for clarification. I am aware due to NAT traversal etc.
>>> multiple SIP registrar servers sharing the same location table will
>>> not work.
>>>
>>> I was just worried this WARNINGs might have some negative impact, but
>>> in that case I will just ignore them.
>>>
>> If opensips finds a non-local socket in a usrloc records, it will fire
>> the warning and use one of its own sockets for dealing with that contact.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Bogdan
>>
>
> Ah, I see now.
>
> When UA1 registered at Proxy1 only, Nathelper OPTIONs are sent from
> both Proxy1 and Proxy2. This is not what I wanted :(
>
> Is there any way to make Proxy2 completely ignore UA1?
>
> Regards,
> Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>