[OpenSIPS-Users] OpenSIPS - OpenXCAP integration

Adrian Georgescu ag at ag-projects.com
Sat Oct 17 08:56:29 CEST 2009


For this 401 problem, can you provide an example of the document your  
try to PUT and let us know the XCAP client you use so that we can  
reproduce your problem.

--
Adrian


On Oct 14, 2009, at 4:11 AM, Sanjeev BA wrote:

> Even with basic authentication, OpenXCAP returns 401 - UnAuthorized  
> response for a XCAP GET request.
>
> And I have 10.0.0.0/24 in my trusted peer list of openxcap config.
>
> Not sure what is the issue here. Please help.
>
> Regard,s
> sanjeev
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sanjeev BA [mailto:as2902.b at samsung.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 8:59 PM
> To: 'OpenSIPS users mailling list'
> Subject: RE: [OpenSIPS-Users] OpenSIPS - OpenXCAP integration
>
> Thanks for the quick reply.
>
> I would like to know if there is a way to get rid of OpenXCAP and  
> let OpenSIPS perform the role of XDM server as well.
> Is this possible? Are there any XDMS modules for OpenSIPS?
>
> Regards,
> Sanjeev
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-bounces at lists.opensips.org [mailto:users-bounces at lists.opensips.org 
> ] On Behalf Of Inaki Baz Castillo
> Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 7:24 PM
> To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] OpenSIPS - OpenXCAP integration
>
> El Domingo, 11 de Octubre de 2009, Sanjeev BA escribio:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have successfully been able to test opensips with openxcap. XCAP
>> documents are modified and subscribe/notify/watcher procedures are  
>> fine
>> with third party SIP clients. I am in the process of testing my  
>> presence
>> user agent in this setup. While trying to add a new contact, I get  
>> a 401
>> unauthorized response.
>
> The 401 sent by OpenXCAP is wrong as it has a malformed "WWW- 
> Authenticate"
> header:
>  http://openxcap.org/ticket/121
>
> Perhaps it works with some devices/softphones ignoring the invalid  
> "\n"
> character in "opaque" field. However a HTTP strict client will fail  
> (as
> EyeBeam does).
>
> Anyhow it seems that nobody cares this bug (no response, comment or  
> bug
> confirmation in 3 months). I tryed to find it but I haven't good  
> Python
> skills.
>
> As a dirty workaround you can use Basic authentication. However note  
> that some
> clients (as EyeBeam) don't support Basic authentication.
>
> Regards.
>
> -- 
> Inaki Baz Castillo <ibc at aliax.net>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users




More information about the Users mailing list