[OpenSIPS-Users] Contact header
Thomas Gelf
thomas at gelf.net
Wed Aug 5 10:32:05 CEST 2009
++
Alex Balashov wrote:
> If we are going to have a cultured and dignified relationship between
> the Kamailio and OpenSIPS camps, which I assume is the goal of everyone
> for reasons of commercial self-preservation if nothing else, then the
> provocations need to stop from both sides.
>
> No, it is not very upstanding to come on the OpenSIPS list only to
> remind its members that you don't use OpenSIPS and that Kamailio is much
> better. Whether you think it's true or not, the OpenSIPS list is not
> the appropriate forum in which to air that thought; it's just not polite.
>
> The values and focus of every community must be respected, and this
> mailing list belongs to the OpenSIPS community and development team.
> There's a certain degree of "when in Rome..." that should be obeyed.
>
> I'm a very committed Debian user, and intensely dislike Redhat-derived
> distributions. But if I am on a mailing list centered chiefly around
> Fedora, CentOS, RHEL, etc. or products based on them, it's just not my
> place to bring up Debian or invite an RH vs. Debian flame war. That's
> just not what the list is for, and my ability to join it and ask a
> question is a privilege, not a right.
>
> That having been said, the provocations need to stop from both sides as
> I said above. That includes tongue-in-cheek comments that imply
> Kamailio defects or fundamental technical or political inferiorities, or
> ones that attempt to explain user perceptions of OpenSIPS in an ad
> hominem manner by way of some kind of Kamailio affiliation or anything
> like that.
>
> Just don't do it. It's bad for business, it's bad for both products,
> it's bad for everyone. NOBODY wins if commercial adopters see this kind
> of petty bickering and egotism, especially from lead developers and
> other significant stakeholders in the commercial ecosystem.
>
More information about the Users
mailing list