[OpenSIPS-Users] NAT: Why replacing "Contact" with thereceivedpublic IP:port instead of adding a parameter with it?
bogdan at voice-system.ro
Fri Nov 7 16:30:13 CET 2008
If I'm not wrong, it's it the "maddr" param what you are looking for.
Without aiming a bias, I was also evaluating the option to store the
original contact and to restore it back.
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2008/11/7 Schumann Sebastian <Sebastian.Schumann at t-com.sk>:
>> Hi Inaki
>> Yes, you are right. Seems my changes work where they should (all same type of phones where modification has to take place, Contact header somehow "well-defined") but are not universal.
>> I will take your inputs to improve my used functions. Thanks!
> I suggest you to study the SIP URI BNF grammar in RFC 3261. It's really complex.
More information about the Users