[OpenSER-Users] MSILO back notify not working

[kokoska rokoska]

Hi Daniel,

for the first look I think it works :-) Thnak you very much!

Regards,

kokoska.rokoska

Daniel-Constantin Mierla napsal(a):
> 
> 
> On 02/05/08 12:52, kokoska rokoska wrote:
>> I would like to have patch for 1.3.0 too :-)
>>   
> thanks for volunteering to test. Here is the attached patch. Let me know 
> if works so I can commit on SVN.
> 
> Cheers,
> Daniel
> 
>> Thanks, regards
>>
>> kokoska.rokoska
>>
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla napsal(a):
>>  
>>> There is bug mistakenly introduced about 2 years ago, if I could spot 
>>> it right on the svn log. A wrong variable for registrar address was 
>>> used. I have just made a commit on trunk. Can you test and let me 
>>> know if works now? If you need patch for 1.3 I can send it to you -- 
>>> I will backport after some testing is done.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/05/08 11:37, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>>>    
>>>> On Tuesday 05 February 2008 10:08:16 Dan-Cristian Bogos wrote:
>>>>        
>>>>> Iñaki,
>>>>>
>>>>> it looks like I have misunderstood your problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> I was speaking about "202 Accepted" confirmation and not a new 
>>>>> MESSAGE.             
>>>> Yes, that was what I meant ;)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>> Why would you need a new message?
>>>>>             
>>>> Because it's the only way that any UAC will show the notification to 
>>>> its user. For example:
>>>>
>>>> - If X-Lite sends a MESSAGE and it's stored and replied by proxy 
>>>> with "202 Accepted" then XLite UI will show nothing to the user, but 
>>>> message correctly received by destination, so he will think that the 
>>>> destinaiton is ireceiving him messages but ignoring them.
>>>>
>>>> - If the message is stored and proxy replies "404 User Not Found, 
>>>> MEssage Stored" then XLite will just show in the UI: "404 User is 
>>>> not online".
>>>>
>>>> - Twinkle will not show the code description for a 202, but it will 
>>>> do it in a negative reply (404 for example), but Twinkle IM is not 
>>>> very advanced yet in usability terms.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best regards.
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at lists.openser.org
>>> http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>     
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.openser.org
>> http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>