[OpenSIPS-Users] [OpenSIPS-Devel] Planning next release - Roadmap

David Villasmil david.villasmil.work at gmail.com
Tue Aug 26 17:29:09 CEST 2008

Isn't it a lot easier (for instance) using a new field the dialog table to
store the last CSeq and getting it from there before sending +1?
just a question

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc at in.ilimit.es>wrote:

> El Tuesday 26 August 2008 17:08:44 Ovidiu Sas escribió:
> > The dialog module is bound to a transaction not to a branch and
> > therefore, at this point in time, it is not branch aware.
> This means that it cannot handle various early dialogs in case of parallel
> forking, and it cannot handle various confirmed dialogs in case of various
> 2XX responses arriving at the same time (before the proxy sends a CANCEL).
> So then, changing the CSeq is just impossible to implement in OpenSIPS
> because
> a branch requiring PRACK would break the CSeq order.
> --
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> ibc at in.ilimit.es
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20080826/2216289c/attachment.htm 

More information about the Users mailing list