[OpenSER-Users] kagoor voiceflow replacement

[Klaus Darilion]

Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Robert Dyck wrote:
>> Question, is $Ri ( the source IP ) writable and if so would this arbitrary 
>> information be available to add_rcv_param?
> 
> Hi Robert!
> 
> No, it is not readable. It would have to be added to Contact URI 
> parameter as well, e.g. "sip:.....;socket=ip.add.re.ss:port"
> 
> Looks like there is always some source code editing necessary - for 
> adding the socket parameter.
> 
> Forcing the sendsocket during INVITE routing could be done by extending 
> the force_sendsocket to accept PV too (if it does not yet) or as a 
> workaround by using dp_apply_policy() from domainpolicy module and 
> setting the send_socket_avp manually.

I think
   $fs = ....
should work too

> 
> regards
> klaus
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Monday 21 April 2008, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>>> Hi all!
>>>
>>> FYI: I just found this old thread:
>>> http://www.openser.org/pipermail/devel/2006-March/002188.html
>>>
>>> I think this could work too. The openser is stateless and encodes the
>>> routing information into Contact URI param:
>>> http://openser.org/docs/modules/1.3.x/nathelper.html#AEN376
>>>
>>>
>>> Further, if save() is used too (not for routing!!!!), then the openser
>>> can be used for NAT pinging too.
>>>
>>> regards
>>> Klaus
>>>
>>> Robert McNaught schrieb:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Has anyone replaced the functionality of a kagoor voiceflow session
>>>> border controller with openser? and is it possible?
>>>>
>>>> TIA
>>>>
>>>> Robert
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Users mailing list
>>>> Users at lists.openser.org
>>>> http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at lists.openser.org
>>> http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.openser.org
> http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users