[OpenSER-Users] Re: [Users] 473 Filtered destination?

Christian Schlatter cs at unc.edu
Mon Jul 23 16:33:53 CEST 2007


We recently had some issues with dns blacklisting and 473 as well, we 
had to disable blacklisting on our production proxies. Unfortunately I 
wasn't able to reproduce the problem so far.

It *seems* that sometimes the blacklist gets activated mistakenly for 
targets that are alive. E.g. we weren't able to call our gateways 
anymore (always got back 473 immediately from the proxy) even though 
these gateways always have been up.

Do you always get back 473 or does this only happen occasionally?

Christian


Zahid Mehmood wrote:
> James,
>   thanks for your reply.
> 
> I tried capturing the 473 in failure route but it doesn't look like it 
> makes it that far.
> 
> t_on_failure("4");
> t_on_reply("4");
>  if (!next_gw()) {
>     sl_send_reply("503", "Service not available - No gateways");
>         xlog("L_ERR","$ci: 503  Service not available - No gateways 
> rU=<$rU>, ruri=<$ru>\n");
>        return;
> };
> 
> if (!t_relay()) {
>     xlog..... msg1
>     sl_reply_error ();
> } else {
>     xlog msg 2
> }
> 
> and I don't see either one of the messages from if (!t_relay()) logged.  
> There is an xlog right at the top of failure route which is not logged 
> either.
> 
> 
> This is what I see in openser log when using dubug=9
> 
> Jul 23 09:35:06 mousse openser[5276]: DBG:check_against_rule_list: using 
> list dns
> Jul 23 09:35:06 mousse openser[5276]: DBG:check_against_rule_list: 
> matched list dns
> Jul 23 09:35:06 mousse openser[5276]: DEBUG:tm:t_forward_nonack: blocked 
> by blacklists
> Jul 23 09:35:06 mousse openser[5276]: ERROR:tm:t_relay_to: 
> t_forward_nonack returned error
> Jul 23 09:35:06 mousse openser[5276]: parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff
> Jul 23 09:35:06 mousse openser[5276]: check_via_address(192.168.12.174, 
> 192.168. 12.174, 0)        (
> Jul 23 09:35:06 mousse openser[5276]: DBG: trans=0xb604f518, callback 
> type 128, id 0 entered
> Jul 23 09:35:06 mousse openser[5276]: ACC: call missed: 
> timestamp=1185197706;method=INVITE;from_tag=F2953709-6DD8ACE4;to_tag=;call_id=2af22500-d6298d67-9e8a6d1a at 192.168.12.174;code=473;reason=Request 
> Failure
> 
> 
> Thanks again for your help.
> 





More information about the Users mailing list