[OpenSER-Users] NAT + STUN
Marc LEURENT
lftsy at free.fr
Thu Aug 2 17:56:55 CEST 2007
Do you have any idea to solve this matter:
In the BYE request:
0(2569) found end of header
0(2569) find_next_route: No next Route HF found
0(2569) after_loose: No next URI found
So the BYE message is not forwarded by openser
Please find below INVITE and BYE requests
0(2632) SIP Request:
0(2632) method: <INVITE>
0(2632) uri: <sip:103 at sd-7501.dedibox.fr:5060>
0(2632) version: <SIP/2.0>
0(2632) parse_headers: flags=2
0(2632) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK4747925369759203710>; state=16
0(2632) end of header reached, state=5
0(2632) parse_headers: Via found, flags=2
0(2632) parse_headers: this is the first via
0(2632) After parse_msg...
0(2632) preparing to run routing scripts...
0(2632) parse_headers: flags=100
0(2632) DEBUG:parse_to:end of header reached, state=10
0(2632) DBUG:parse_to: display={}, ruri={sip:103 at sd-7501.dedibox.fr:5060;user=phone}
0(2632) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [46]; uri=[sip:103 at sd-7501.dedibox.fr:5060;user=phone]
0(2632) DEBUG: to body [<sip:103 at sd-7501.dedibox.fr:5060;user=phone>
]
0(2632) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <1> <INVITE>
0(2632) DEBUG:maxfwd:is_maxfwd_present: value = 70
0(2632) DBG:maxfwd:process_maxfwd_header: value 70 decreased to 10
0(2632) ROUTE2: STARTING NAT DETECTION
0(2632) !!!!!!!!! NAT UAC TEST 19 SUCEDEED
0(2632) parse_headers: flags=80
0(2632) ROUTE2: SETFLAG 3
0(2632) DEBUG: add_param: tag=c0a80101-b67ff5
0(2632) DEBUG:parse_to:end of header reached, state=29
0(2632) DBUG:parse_to: display={"101"}, ruri={sip:101 at sd-7501.dedibox.fr:5060;user=phone}
0(2632) parse_headers: flags=200
0(2632) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=269
0(2632) found end of header
0(2632) find_first_route: No Route headers found
0(2632) loose_route: There is no Route HF
0(2632) DEBUG: has_totag: no totag
0(2632) I AM SETTING THE FLAGS FOR RADIUS
0(2632) SETTING FLAGS 1 & 2 FOR RADIUS
0(2632) CHECKING IF URI <> myself
0(2632) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 18==12 && [sd-7501.dedibox.fr] == [88.191.45.91]
0(2632) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
0(2632) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 18==12 && [sd-7501.dedibox.fr] == [88.191.45.91]
0(2632) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
0(2632) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 18==12 && [sd-7501.dedibox.fr] == [88.191.45.91]
0(2632) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
0(2632) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 18==12 && [sd-7501.dedibox.fr] == [88.191.45.91]
0(2632) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
0(2632) rewrite_uri: Rewriting Request-URI with 'sip:103 at 82.127.0.79:1028;user=phone'
0(2632) parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff
0(2632) STARTING ROUTE 1
0(2632) subst_run: running. r=1
0(2632) subst_str: no match
0(2632) FLAG 3 OK GOTO ROUTE 3
0(2632) !!!!!!!!! ON ROUTE 3 FOR NATTED CONTACT
0(2632) DEBUG: t_newtran: T on entrance=0xffffffff
0(2632) parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff
0(2632) parse_headers: flags=78
0(2632) t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=12532, isACK=0
0(2632) DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed
0(2632) DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found
0(2632) DBG: trans=0xb5c08fa8, callback type 1, id 1 entered
0(2632) trace_onreq_in: trace off...
0(2632) DBG: trans=0xb5c08fa8, callback type 1, id 0 entered
0(2632) parse_headers: flags=78
0(2632) DEBUG: noisy_timer set for accounting
0(2632) DEBUG:rr:is_direction: param ftag not found
0(2632) parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff
0(2632) check_via_address(82.127.0.79, 82.127.0.79, 0)
0(2569) SIP Request:
0(2569) method: <BYE>
0(2569) uri: <sip:101 at 82.127.0.79:1312>
0(2569) version: <SIP/2.0>
0(2569) parse_headers: flags=2
0(2569) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK2074253192092946047>; state=16
0(2569) end of header reached, state=5
0(2569) parse_headers: Via found, flags=2
0(2569) parse_headers: this is the first via
0(2569) After parse_msg...
0(2569) preparing to run routing scripts...
0(2569) parse_headers: flags=100
0(2569) DEBUG: add_param: tag=c0a80101-b31387
0(2569) DEBUG:parse_to:end of header reached, state=29
0(2569) DBUG:parse_to: display={}, ruri={sip:101 at sd-7501.dedibox.fr:5060;user=phone}
0(2569) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [66]; uri=[sip:101 at sd-7501.dedibox.fr:5060;user=phone]
0(2569) DEBUG: to body [<sip:101 at sd-7501.dedibox.fr:5060;user=phone>]
0(2569) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <1> <BYE>
0(2569) DEBUG:maxfwd:is_maxfwd_present: value = 70
0(2569) DBG:maxfwd:process_maxfwd_header: value 70 decreased to 10
0(2569) ROUTE2: STARTING NAT DETECTION
0(2569) !!!!!!!!! NAT UAC TEST 19 SUCEDEED
0(2569) parse_headers: flags=80
0(2569) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0
0(2569) found end of header
0(2569) ROUTE2: SETFLAG 3
0(2569) DEBUG: add_param: tag=c0a80101-2376fc2
0(2569) DEBUG:parse_to:end of header reached, state=29
0(2569) DBUG:parse_to: display={}, ruri={sip:103 at sd-7501.dedibox.fr:5060;user=phone}
0(2569) parse_headers: flags=200
0(2569) is_preloaded: No
0(2569) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==12 && [82.127.0.79] == [88.191.45.91]
0(2569) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 1312
0(2569) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 11==12 && [82.127.0.79] == [88.191.45.91]
0(2569) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 1312
0(2569) DEBUG:check_self: host != me
0(2569) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 12==12 && [88.191.45.91] == [88.191.45.91]
0(2569) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060
0(2569) after_loose: Topmost route URI: 'sip:88.191.45.91;lr=on;ftag=c0a80101-b31387' is me
0(2569) parse_headers: flags=200
0(2569) found end of header
0(2569) find_next_route: No next Route HF found
0(2569) after_loose: No next URI found
0(2569) DBG:rr:run_rr_callbacks: callback id 0 entered with <lr=on;ftag=c0a80101-b31387>
Dan-Cristian Bogos a écrit :
> That's because for INVITE your will take routing decisions but BYE u
> will just proxy out.
>
> DanB
>
> On 8/2/07, Marc LEURENT <lftsy at free.fr> wrote:
>> I've compared the INVITE and BYE method....
>> And the uri in the INVITE method is
>> 0(2632) SIP Request:
>> 0(2632) method: <INVITE>
>> 0(2632) uri: <sip:103 at sd-7501.dedibox.fr:5060>
>> 0(2632) version: <SIP/2.0>
>>
>> whereas in the BYE method
>>
>> 0(2569) SIP Request:
>> 0(2569) method: <BYE>
>> 0(2569) uri: <sip:101 at 82.127.0.79:1312>
>> 0(2569) version: <SIP/2.0>
>>
>>
>> so the DEBUG:check_self: host != me
>> I'm going to try without accoounting, but it should'nt change anything...
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
More information about the Users
mailing list