[Users] Can't replace duplicate c= lines in SDP

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bogdan at voice-system.ro
Tue Nov 28 09:41:45 CET 2006


Hi Jerome,

Jerome Martin wrote:

>Hello Ovidiu and Bogdan,
>
>Thanks a lot for both of your answers. I should have be more carefull
>with that issue, as I'm afraid I should have solved this myself,
>especially because it has already been specifically addressed both here
>and in the v1.1 nathelper module.
>
>The thing is I did read about the "c" option in force_rtp_proxy
>documentation, I just got confused by session/media description in SDP.
>Now that I've just read the RFC2327 (which I already went through, but
>not carefully enough), everything is clear as crystal :-)
>
>So, if I have a message for people like me reading this : RTFR(FCs) !!!
>(this is sooo much compatible with the Fu****g word than the plain old
>RTFM.).
>
>Bogdan wrote:
>  
>
>>this is a topic that was debated couple of times. according to the
>>SDP 
>>RFC, the connection information (c=) can exists both in session 
>>description (s= section ) and in media description (m= section). This 
>>because a session may contain several media description and if the c=
>>in 
>>media is not specify, the one from session is used.
>>    
>>
>
>Now that I've read it, I'm gonna be bitchy about it : ain't the session
>description delimited by "v=" and not "s=", according to RFC2327 ? ;-p
>  
>
yes, that is correct - it is v= and not s= - mea culpa :)

regards,
bogdan

>Thanks again,
>I was really amazed by such a fast answer (first time I post here).
>
>Best Regards,
>Jerome Martin
>
>
>  
>





More information about the Users mailing list