Fwd: Re: [Users] Query on Registration

[Vivek Bhat]

Hi,

There is no special purpose to remove Via. But, I just
tried to remove the original "Via", and observed this
problem.  

Thanks,
Vivek
-------------------------

>Hello,
>
I> do not think it is needed to remove the Via header
for replication >of  REGISTER. Is there a special
purpose for it?
>
>Cheers,
>Daniel
--- samuel <samu60 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:40:46 +0200
> From: samuel <samu60 at gmail.com>
> To: "Ohad.Levy at infineon.com"
> <Ohad.Levy at infineon.com>
> Subject: Re: [Users] Query on Registration
> CC: vigibi at yahoo.com, users at openser.org
> 
> You can also try to do it outside the config, using
> the UNIX/FIFO
> interface and the t_uac "function".
> 
> just my 2 cents..
> SAmuel.
> 
> 2006/7/27, Ohad.Levy at infineon.com
> <Ohad.Levy at infineon.com>:
> > What about t_replicate?
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: users-bounces at openser.org
> [mailto:users-bounces at openser.org] On
> > > Behalf Of Vivek Bhat
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 1:22 AM
> > > To: users at openser.org
> > > Subject: [Users] Query on Registration
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am trying to implement Third-Party
> registration in
> > > IMS environment using OPENSER as S-CSCF. Here is
> what
> > > I want to do:
> > >
> > > UAC
> > >
> >
>
........................................................................
> > ..
> > > ...........S-CSCF
> > > (Openser)
> > >
> > >                                      REGISTER
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------->
> > >
> > >                                       200 OK
> > >
> > > <--------------------------------------
> > >
> > > This part is working fine.
> > >
> > > Now, S-CSCF sends separate REGISTER to
> Application
> > > Server (AS) and needs to get the response. But,
> this
> > > response should NOT be sent to UAC.
> > >
> > > S-CSCF
> > >
> >
>
........................................................................
> > ..
> > > .
> > >  AS
> > >
> > >                                        REGISTER
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------->
> > >
> > >                                       Response
> > > ([1-6]xx
> > >
> > > <-----------------------------------------
> > >
> > > I tried to send this REGISTER by removing old
> headers
> > > from  the  first REGISTER received from UAC and
> > > creating my own (using remove_hf and append_hf).
> Also,
> > > I just removed the old "via" header, and Openser
> > > automatically added new Via header with  openser
> ip
> > > address.
> > >
> > > However, when AS sends the response, S-CSCF
> forwards
> > > this response to UAC even though Via header does
>   NOT
> > > contain    the UAC IP address. Why is that? How
> to
> > > stop relaying the  any  response received from
> AS to
> > > UAC? Or else, is it possible to create a new
> REGISTER
> > > request from OpenSER?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Vivek
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Users mailing list
> > > Users at openser.org
> > >
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users at openser.org
> > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com