[Users] SER as loadbalancer and NAT
andreas.granig at inode.info
Wed Jan 11 13:29:15 CET 2006
Klaus Darilion wrote:
>> I wonder if there are known side effects if I use fix_nated_contact()
>> in combination with nat_flag in the registrar module instead of
>> fix_nated_register() to save NATed contacts?
> I think the only limitation is, that the SIP client sees a modified URI
> in incoming INVITE requests and in the 200 Ok responses for the REGISTER
> messages. I guess most clients do not care, but AFAI remember there was
> a posting that a client did not accept the 200 Ok reponse with the
> modified contact.
I faintly remembered this discussion, thus the question.
But I see this approach isn't RFC compliant, so maybe it's better to
forget this hack and go for a clean Path-Header solution...
More information about the Users