[Users] registrar table size

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu bogdan at voice-system.ro
Wed Apr 26 09:49:33 CEST 2006


Hi,

the sequential requests like ACK (for 200 OK) and BYE are routed based 
on route set (RR and contact). I strongly advice you to read how this 
works from the SIP RFC. It will answer to all your questions.

regards,
bogdan



Poppenhouse Kent-P28924 wrote:

>Thank you for all you help.  Hopefully this will be the last time I have
>to bother you.
>I was wondering about the handling of ACKs.
>
>If userA sends an ACK to the SER, it forwards to userB rewriting the URI
>domain with IP of userB.  Good, however I need this scenario:
>
>userA sends ACK to Proxy, Proxy adds via sends to SER, SER adds via
>rewrites URI domain with IP of userB sends to new proxy, new proxy gets
>ACK adds via and sends to userB.  SER is using
>t_relay_to_udp("proxyIP","5060") so all messages go through another
>proxy before reaching the enduser.
>
>This works for Invites, and Bye, but for the stateless ACKs the SER does
>not forward the ACK but instead says:  sl_send_reply:  I won't send a
>reply for ACK!!.
>
>Is there an easy way to make the SER rewrite the URI with the IP and
>forward it on?  
>I tried using if (method=="ACK") forward(proxyIP,5060), which seems to
>work but the lookup("location") does not seem to rewrite the URI with
>the IP, keeps it as a domain name.
>
>Thanks again for all your help.
>  
>





More information about the Users mailing list