[OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] Use the Additional section of SRV queries instead of doing extra requests (#675)

[Trevor Steyn]

Ah sorry i see it does respond with the records :)

Trying "_sip._udp.salinux.za.net"
Using domain server:
Name: 176.9.63.107
Address: 176.9.63.107#53
Aliases:

;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 27621
;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 8

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;_sip._udp.salinux.za.net.    IN    SRV

;; ANSWER SECTION:
_sip._udp.salinux.za.net. 600    IN    SRV    10 10 5060
sip3.salinux.za.net.
_sip._udp.salinux.za.net. 600    IN    SRV    10 10 5060
sip1.salinux.za.net.
_sip._udp.salinux.za.net. 600    IN    SRV    10 10 5060
sip2.salinux.za.net.
_sip._udp.salinux.za.net. 600    IN    SRV    10 10 5060
sip4.salinux.za.net.

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
salinux.za.net.        600    IN    NS    betrayel.webon.co.za.
salinux.za.net.        600    IN    NS    bladerunner.itns.co.za.

;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
sip1.salinux.za.net.    600    IN    A    88.88.88.1
sip2.salinux.za.net.    600    IN    A    88.88.88.2
sip3.salinux.za.net.    600    IN    A    88.88.88.3
sip4.salinux.za.net.    600    IN    A    88.88.88.4



On 14/10/2015 13:07, Trevor Steyn wrote:
> Hi Vlad,
>
> You can use the following record, not sure what you need it for as i
> understand the additional sections show the NS for queried domain.
>
> _sip._udp.salinux.za.net
>
> The domains don't go anywhere but it should serve your purpose.
>
> Trying "_sip._udp.salinux.za.net"
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 6456
> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 4
>
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> ;_sip._udp.salinux.za.net.    IN    SRV
>
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> _sip._udp.salinux.za.net. 600    IN    SRV    10 10 5060
> sip3.salinux.za.net.
> _sip._udp.salinux.za.net. 600    IN    SRV    10 10 5060
> sip4.salinux.za.net.
> _sip._udp.salinux.za.net. 600    IN    SRV    10 10 5060
> sip1.salinux.za.net.
> _sip._udp.salinux.za.net. 600    IN    SRV    10 10 5060
> sip2.salinux.za.net.
>
> Regards
> Trevor Steyn
>
> On 14/10/2015 10:48, vladpaiu wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> This would be a great feature to implement - though I can't really
>> find such a SRV record ( with additional records ) out in the wild,
>> in order to have something to test against.. Could you please provide
>> such a SRV DNS record that I can test with ?
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Vlad
>>
>> —
>> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
>> <https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/675#issuecomment-147978818>.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devel mailing list
>> Devel at lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20151014/26061566/attachment.htm>