[OpenSIPS-Users] Topology Hiding / 302

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

That is true Pete,

Could you open a bug report on the GITHUB tracker please ?

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com

On 28.09.2015 14:27, Pete Kelly wrote:
>
>
> On 28 September 2015 at 12:23, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 
> <bogdan at opensips.org <mailto:bogdan at opensips.org>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Pete,
>
>     You mean that ideally the username part of Contact URI should be
>     preserve through TH ?
>
>
> Yes, and also the domain, which would need to be preserved if the UAS 
> wanted to 302 to a completely different URI?
>
>
>     Regards,
>
>     Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>     OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>     http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>
>     On 23.09.2015 11:40, Pete Kelly wrote:
>>     This is something I have noticed for a while now and came across
>>     it again the other day.
>>
>>     Basically if you are using topology hiding and the UAS sends a
>>     302, the data (new $ru) in the Contact header is not persisted to
>>     the UAC, meaning topology hiding is not valid in a scenario where
>>     a 302 may be found.
>>
>>     Is there a known way to get round this currently (am I missing
>>     something in the docs!)
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Users mailing list
>>     Users at lists.opensips.org  <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>>     http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150928/533b3173/attachment.htm>