[OpenSIPS-Users] PAID header issue

[Stuart Mills, Invosys]

Hi Bogdan,

 

Thanks for this, it should help a lot.

 

Regards,

 

Stuart

 

From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bogdan at opensips.org] 
Sent: 15 January 2015 11:59
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list; stuart.mills at invosys.com
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] PAID header issue

 

Hi Stuart,

Indeed, the PAI hdr makes no sense in the replies. Nevertheless, their
presence there is harmless and it should not affect the traffic or
interoperability at all (at least not according to RFC3261).

Regards,



Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com

On 14.01.2015 18:10, Stuart Mills, Invosys wrote:

Hi,

 

I'm being told by my carrier that they are seeing this info in replies back
from opensips and I've been asked to stop it.

 

P-Asserted-Identity: "+3532108511205" sip:+3532108511205 at x.x.x.x

 

Quote from engineer working for the carrier - 

 

"With my Egress you are sending us PAID in the PROGRESS and OK message which
is not required,  let me know once you have sorted out the PAID issue and
will retest."

 

Does anyone know if this is correct what they are saying?

 

Kind Regards

 

Stuart Mills

 






_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users at lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150115/adf03d20/attachment.htm>