[OpenSIPS-Users] Siptrace Issue

Seth Schultz sschultz at scholarchip.com
Thu Feb 7 20:25:38 CET 2013


Alexander,

I am not so much worried about the port range.  I am trying to determine 
where that port is coming from in the first place. Nothing on my end 
should ever be advertising anything other than port 5060.  I believe it 
is getting corrupted somewhere, just not sure how to track it down.

Thanks,
Seth

Seth Schultz
E-Mail: sschultz at scholarchip.com
Phone: 212.255.8005 x 124
Fax: 212.255.8091

On 2/7/2013 2:13 PM, Alexandr Dubovikov wrote:
> I can make a patch to ignore the port range, but I think something wrong in
> the socket structure: the port number is too high.
>
> Wbr,
> Alexandr
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-bounces at lists.opensips.org
> [mailto:users-bounces at lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Seth Schultz
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 7:40 PM
> To: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> Cc: OpenSIPS users mailling list
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Siptrace Issue
>
> Bogdan,
>
> The patch did solve the error I was receiving, however, now I am receiving a
> new error "ERROR:siptrace:pipport2su: invalid port number; must be in
> [1024,65536]".  I captured some information from the branch route and I also
> modified the error message to display the port number.
> I also added abort(); just after the error message to capture a core file.
> I have no idea where this port number is coming from.
>
> Feb  7 13:33:17 opensips-vm /sbin/opensips[15149]: ----- BRANCH:
> 172.16.1.105 <null> domain=172.16.1.1 port=5060 transport=udp
> uri=sip:172.16.1.1
> Feb  7 13:33:17 opensips-vm /sbin/opensips[15149]:
> ERROR:siptrace:pipport2su: port = 5060060 invalid port number; must be in
> [1024,65536] Feb  7 13:33:17 opensips-vm /sbin/opensips[15146]:
> ERROR:siptrace:pipport2su: port = 5060600 invalid port number; must be in
> [1024,65536] Feb  7 13:33:19 opensips-vm /sbin/opensips[15140]:
> ERROR:siptrace:pipport2su: port = 5060060 invalid port number; must be in
> [1024,65536]
>
>
> Thanks for all your help. I truly appreciate it!
> Seth
>
> On 2/7/2013 6:52 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>> Hi Seth,
>>
>> Thanks a lot for your help - I found and hopefully fixed the bug - I
>> made the commit on SVN trunk only and I would ask you to test it first
>> (see the attached patch). Let me know if works fine for you and i will
>> do the backport .
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>
>>
>> On 02/06/2013 10:35 PM, Seth Schultz wrote:
>>> loadmodule "db_mysql.so"
>>> loadmodule "cfgutils.so"
>>> loadmodule "avpops.so"
>>> loadmodule "mi_fifo.so"
>>> loadmodule "maxfwd.so"
>>> loadmodule "nathelper.so"
>>> loadmodule "tm.so"
>>> loadmodule "dialplan.so"
>>> loadmodule "sl.so"
>>> loadmodule "rr.so"
>>> loadmodule "dialog.so"
>>> loadmodule "uri.so"
>>> loadmodule "textops.so"
>>> loadmodule "sipmsgops.so"
>>> loadmodule "siptrace.so"
>>> loadmodule "permissions.so"
>>> loadmodule "load_balancer.so"
>>> loadmodule "rtpproxy.so"
>>> loadmodule "acc.so"
>>> loadmodule "signaling.so"
>>>
>>> On 2/6/2013 3:32 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>>>> I see...Could you send me the list of modules you are using ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>>>> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 02/06/2013 10:29 PM, Seth Schultz wrote:
>>>>> I have seen this error occur on both 1.8.2 and 1.9.0.  Below is the
>>>>> output from opensips -V on both versions I am running.  The trace I
>>>>> provided came from 1.9.0-rc-notls.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Seth
>>>>>
>>>>> (My development environment)
>>>>> version: opensips 1.9.0-rc-notls (x86_64/linux)
>>>>> flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST,
>>>>> SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT
>>>>> ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN
>>>>> 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535 poll method support: poll,
>>>>> epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
>>>>> svnrevision: 2:9753M
>>>>> @(#) $Id: main.c 9329 2012-10-16 17:23:32Z bogdan_iancu $ main.c
>>>>> compiled on 17:29:59 Feb  5 2013 with gcc 4.6
>>>>>
>>>>> and
>>>>>
>>>>> (My production environment)
>>>>> version: opensips 1.8.2-notls (x86_64/linux)
>>>>> flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST,
>>>>> SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT
>>>>> ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN
>>>>> 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535 poll method support: poll,
>>>>> epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
>>>>> svnrevision: 2:9718M
>>>>> @(#) $Id: main.c 9330 2012-10-16 17:25:38Z bogdan_iancu $ main.c
>>>>> compiled on 01:14:02 Feb  4 2013 with gcc 4.5.2
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2/6/2013 3:24 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>>>>>> Thanks !
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looks like the actual socket structure is altered :
>>>>>>       sock_str = {s = 0x7f4818da11b8 "udp:172.16.1.115", len = 21}
>>>>>>
>>>>>> length is 21, while only 16 chars are printed -> 5 are missing (
>>>>>> ':' + 4 for port) .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What exact opensips revision are you using ? I need to figure out
>>>>>> a way to see where in the code the sock_str is altered.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>>>>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>>>>>> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 02/06/2013 09:59 PM, Seth Schultz wrote:
>>>>>>> Here is the output:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> #0  0x00007f4820da1425 in raise () from
>>>>>>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
>>>>>>> (gdb) f 5
>>>>>>> #5  0x00007f4815ef8a61 in trace_msg_out (msg=0x7f4817464340,
>>>>>>> sbuf=<optimized out>, send_sock=<optimized out>, proto=1,
>>>>>>> to=<optimized out>) at siptrace.c:1053
>>>>>>> 1053            if
>>>>>>> (save_siptrace(msg,avp,&avp_value,db_keys,db_vals) < 0) {
>>>>>>> (gdb) p trace_local_ip
>>>>>>> $1 = {s = 0x0, len = 0}
>>>>>>> (gdb) p send_sock
>>>>>>> $2 = <optimized out>
>>>>>>> (gdb) p to
>>>>>>> $3 = <optimized out>
>>>>>>> (gdb) f 6
>>>>>>> #6  0x00007f4815efbe5c in trace_onreq_out (t=<optimized out>,
>>>>>>> type=<optimized out>, ps=0x7fff9f5d43d0) at siptrace.c:937
>>>>>>> 937                     trace_msg_out( ps->req, (str*)ps->extra1,
>>>>>>> (gdb) p ((struct dest_info*)ps->extra2)->send_sock
>>>>>>> $4 = (struct socket_info *) 0x7f4818d72e08
>>>>>>> (gdb) p *((struct dest_info*)ps->extra2)->send_sock
>>>>>>> $5 = {socket = 5, name = {s = 0x7f4818d72f10 "172.16.1.115", len
>>>>>>> = 12}, address = {af = 2, len = 4, u = {addrl = {1929449644, 0},
>>>>>>> addr32 = {1929449644, 0, 0, 0}, addr16 = {4268, 29441, 0, 0, 0,
>>>>>>> 0, 0,
>>>>>>>          0}, addr = "\254\020\001s", '\000' <repeats 11 times>}},
>>>>>>> address_str = {s = 0x7f4818da1190 "172.16.1.115", len = 12},
>>>>>>> port_no = 5060, port_no_str = {s = 0x7f4818da1170 "5060", len = 4},
>>>>>>>    flags = SI_NONE, su = {s = {sa_family = 2, sa_data =
>>>>>>> "\023\304\254\020\001s\000\000\000\000\000\000\000"}, sin =
>>>>>>> {sin_family = 2, sin_port = 50195, sin_addr = {s_addr = 1929449644},
>>>>>>>        sin_zero = "\000\000\000\000\000\000\000"}, sin6 =
>>>>>>> {sin6_family = 2, sin6_port = 50195, sin6_flowinfo = 1929449644,
>>>>>>> sin6_addr = {__in6_u = {__u6_addr8 = '\000' <repeats 15 times>,
>>>>>>>            __u6_addr16 = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, __u6_addr32 =
>>>>>>> {0, 0, 0, 0}}}, sin6_scope_id = 0}}, proto = 1, sock_str = {s =
>>>>>>> 0x7f4818da11b8 "udp:172.16.1.115", len = 21}, adv_sock_str = {s =
>>>>>>> 0x0,
>>>>>>>      len = 0}, adv_name_str = {s = 0x0, len = 0}, adv_port_str =
>>>>>>> {s = 0x0, len = 0}, adv_address = {af = 0, len = 0, u = {addrl =
>>>>>>> {0, 0}, addr32 = {0, 0, 0, 0}, addr16 = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0},
>>>>>>>        addr = '\000' <repeats 15 times>}}, adv_port = 0, children
>>>>>>> = 8, next = 0x0, prev = 0x0}
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2/6/2013 2:56 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>>>>>>>> Cool :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In gdb, please do :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> f 5
>>>>>>>> p trace_local_ip
>>>>>>>> p send_sock
>>>>>>>> p to
>>>>>>>> f 6
>>>>>>>> p ((struct dest_info*)ps->extra2)->send_sock p *((struct
>>>>>>>> dest_info*)ps->extra2)->send_sock
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>>>>>>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>>>>>>>> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 02/06/2013 09:48 PM, Seth Schultz wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for all your help.  I was finally able to get the system
>>>>>>>>> to dump a core file. Here is the output from the backtrace.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #0  0x00007f4820da1425 in raise () from
>>>>>>>>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
>>>>>>>>> #1  0x00007f4820da4b8b in abort () from
>>>>>>>>> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
>>>>>>>>> #2  0x00007f4815ee2d30 in pipport2su (pipport=<optimized out>,
>>>>>>>>> tmp_su=0x7fff9f5d4230, proto=<optimized out>) at
>>>>>>>>> siptrace.c:1798
>>>>>>>>> #3  0x00007f4815ee4ba3 in trace_send_hep_duplicate
>>>>>>>>> (toip=0x7f48160ff9e0 "udp:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060",
>>>>>>>>> fromip=0x7f4818da11b8 "udp:172.16.1.115", body=<optimized out>)
>>>>>>>>> at siptrace.c:1619
>>>>>>>>> #4  save_siptrace (avp=0x7f4794ebf600,
>>>>>>>>> first_val=0x7fff9f5d4300, vals=0x7f48160ffdc0,
>>>>>>>>> keys=0x7f48160ffcc0, msg=<optimized out>) at siptrace.c:533
>>>>>>>>> #5  0x00007f4815ef8a61 in trace_msg_out (msg=0x7f4817464340,
>>>>>>>>> sbuf=<optimized out>, send_sock=<optimized out>, proto=1,
>>>>>>>>> to=<optimized out>) at siptrace.c:1053
>>>>>>>>> #6  0x00007f4815efbe5c in trace_onreq_out (t=<optimized out>,
>>>>>>>>> type=<optimized out>, ps=0x7fff9f5d43d0) at siptrace.c:937
>>>>>>>>> #7  0x00007f481721e8b2 in run_trans_callbacks (type=1024,
>>>>>>>>> trans=0x7f4794eba310, req=<optimized out>, rpl=<optimized out>,
>>>>>>>>> code=<optimized out>) at t_hooks.c:212
>>>>>>>>> #8  0x00007f481721d76d in t_forward_nonack (t=0x7f4794eba310,
>>>>>>>>> p_msg=0x7f4817464340, proxy=<optimized out>) at t_fwd.c:753
>>>>>>>>> #9  0x00007f481723c248 in w_t_relay (p_msg=0x7f4817464340,
>>>>>>>>> proxy=0x0, flags=<optimized out>) at tm.c:1160
>>>>>>>>> #10 0x0000000000418b47 in do_action (a=0x7f4818d8ea88,
>>>>>>>>> msg=0x7f4817464340) at action.c:1714
>>>>>>>>> #11 0x000000000041deee in run_action_list (a=<optimized out>,
>>>>>>>>> msg=0x7f4817464340) at action.c:170
>>>>>>>>> #12 0x0000000000499d9e in eval_elem (e=0x7f4818d8eb60,
>>>>>>>>> msg=0x7f4817464340, val=0x0) at route.c:1499
>>>>>>>>> #13 0x00000000004998bd in eval_expr (e=0x7f4818d8eb60,
>>>>>>>>> msg=0x7f4817464340, val=0x0) at route.c:1844
>>>>>>>>> #14 0x0000000000499974 in eval_expr (e=0x7f4818d8ebb0,
>>>>>>>>> msg=0x7f4817464340, val=0x0) at route.c:1860
>>>>>>>>> #15 0x00000000004998aa in eval_expr (e=0x7f4818d8ec00,
>>>>>>>>> msg=0x7f4817464340, val=0x0) at route.c:1865
>>>>>>>>> #16 0x000000000041875a in do_action (a=0x7f4818d8eef0,
>>>>>>>>> msg=0x7f4817464340) at action.c:992
>>>>>>>>> #17 0x000000000041deee in run_action_list (a=<optimized out>,
>>>>>>>>> msg=0x7f4817464340) at action.c:170
>>>>>>>>> #18 0x000000000041b7f0 in do_action (a=0x7f4818d8f418,
>>>>>>>>> msg=0x7f4817464340) at action.c:1009
>>>>>>>>> #19 0x000000000041deee in run_action_list (a=<optimized out>,
>>>>>>>>> msg=0x7f4817464340) at action.c:170
>>>>>>>>> #20 0x000000000041b7f0 in do_action (a=0x7f4818d8f4f0,
>>>>>>>>> msg=0x7f4817464340) at action.c:1009
>>>>>>>>> #21 0x000000000041deee in run_action_list (a=<optimized out>,
>>>>>>>>> msg=0x7f4817464340) at action.c:170
>>>>>>>>> #22 0x000000000041e420 in run_actions (msg=0x7f4817464340,
>>>>>>>>> a=0x7f4818d8c3c0) at action.c:136
>>>>>>>>> #23 run_actions (msg=0x7f4817464340, a=0x7f4818d8c3c0) at
>>>>>>>>> action.c:189
>>>>>>>>> #24 run_top_route (a=0x7f4818d8c3c0, msg=0x7f4817464340) at
>>>>>>>>> action.c:210
>>>>>>>>> #25 0x00007f4817232f22 in run_failure_handlers
>>>>>>>>> (t=0x7f4794eba310) at t_reply.c:657
>>>>>>>>> #26 t_should_relay_response (Trans=0x7f4794eba310,
>>>>>>>>> new_code=<optimized out>, branch=0,
>>>>>>>>> should_store=0x7fff9f5d6480, should_relay=<optimized out>,
>>>>>>>>> cancel_bitmap=<optimized out>,
>>>>>>>>>      reply=0xffffffffffffffff) at t_reply.c:956
>>>>>>>>> #27 0x00007f4817232fb9 in relay_reply (t=0x7f4794eba310,
>>>>>>>>> p_msg=0xffffffffffffffff, branch=0, msg_status=408,
>>>>>>>>> cancel_bitmap=0x7fff9f5d6520) at t_reply.c:1170
>>>>>>>>> #28 0x00007f4817237a75 in fake_reply (branch=<optimized out>,
>>>>>>>>> t=0x7f4794eba310, code=<optimized out>) at timer.c:259
>>>>>>>>> #29 final_response_handler (fr_tl=<optimized out>) at
>>>>>>>>> timer.c:370
>>>>>>>>> #30 timer_routine (ticks=84, attr=<optimized out>) at
>>>>>>>>> timer.c:1011
>>>>>>>>> #31 0x00000000004d8cf2 in timer_ticker (drift=<synthetic
>>>>>>>>> pointer>, timer_list=<optimized out>) at timer.c:384
>>>>>>>>> #32 run_timer_process (tpl=<optimized out>) at timer.c:500
>>>>>>>>> #33 start_timer_processes () at timer.c:610
>>>>>>>>> #34 0x000000000041523a in main_loop () at main.c:945
>>>>>>>>> #35 main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at
>>>>>>>>> main.c:1541
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2/6/2013 2:27 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> That's because you need to have "root" permissions to write
>>>>>>>>>> into /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern (used for forcing the core
>>>>>>>>>> file pattern). You should comment in the init.d file the line
>>>>>>>>>> for writting into that file.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>>>>>>>>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 02/06/2013 08:52 PM, Seth Schultz wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately I am having trouble getting the system to dump
>>>>>>>>>>> a core file. Here is the error message I am getting once I
>>>>>>>>>>> enable core dumps.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> /etc/init.d/opensips: 103: /etc/init.d/opensips: cannot
>>>>>>>>>>> create /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern: Permission denied
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have also tried starting opensips as the root user, but it
>>>>>>>>>>> still throws this error.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Here is my /etc/defaults/opensips:
>>>>>>>>>>> RUN_OPENSIPS=yes
>>>>>>>>>>> USER=opensips
>>>>>>>>>>> GROUP=opensips
>>>>>>>>>>> S_MEMORY=1024
>>>>>>>>>>> P_MEMORY=32
>>>>>>>>>>> DUMP_CORE=yes
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And here are the relevant lines in /etc/init.d/opensips:
>>>>>>>>>>> if test "$DUMP_CORE" = "yes" ; then
>>>>>>>>>>>      # set proper ulimit
>>>>>>>>>>>      ulimit -c unlimited
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>      # directory for the core dump files
>>>>>>>>>>>      COREDIR=/home/corefiles
>>>>>>>>>>>      [ -d $COREDIR ] || mkdir $COREDIR
>>>>>>>>>>>      chmod 777 $COREDIR
>>>>>>>>>>>      echo "$COREDIR/core.%e.sig%s.%p" >
>>>>>>>>>>> /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern fi
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> Seth
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/6/2013 12:27 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> yes, you have to, if using the debian init.d files.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The core will be dumped into the opensips working directory
>>>>>>>>>>>> - if not configured one, it will be in root file system "/".
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>>>>>>>>>>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 02/06/2013 07:02 PM, Seth Schultz wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I assume I also need to set the following variable in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> /etc/default/opensips.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> change
>>>>>>>>>>>>> DUMP_CORE=no
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> DUMP_CORE=yes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This may be a silly question, but where will it dump the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> core file to?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seth
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/6/2013 11:56 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where you changed the LM_ERR() in code, after it, simply
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> put : abort(); . Recompile and run again -> when you get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the error, opensips should stop by itself with a core
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dump. Once you get the core file, use gdb to get a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> backtrace  (run "bt" on gdb).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 02/06/2013 06:23 PM, Seth Schultz wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bogdan-Andrei,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for the reply.  I have seen this error occur in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both 1.8.2 and 1.9.0.  Would you please explain exactly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how I can catch the error and call abort()? Also, is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there anything else I can enable which would help us
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> track down the cause?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seth
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/6/2013 11:09 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Seth,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is really strange - using 1.9 or 1.8 ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do make it short, could you put an "abort()" when the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> error is triggered ? -> we could look into backtrace to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see where the faulty string comes from.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 02/06/2013 01:09 AM, Seth Schultz wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could someone please help me resolve the following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> error message "ERROR:siptrace:pipport2su: no port
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specified". This error only happens on some of the sip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> packets, but I can't determine why. When this error
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> occurs, the trace for those packets never make it to my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> homer capture server (I have to use ngrep to see them).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Furthermore, I modified siptrace.c to output the value
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of pipport and the error message returned this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "ERROR:siptrace:pipport2su: udp:172.16.1.115 no port
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specified".  I am just not sure where it is getting the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> udp:172.16.1.115 value from.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seth
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here are my module parameters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> port=5060
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> listen=udp:172.16.1.115:5060 ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> loadmodule "siptrace.so"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modparam("siptrace", "enable_ack_trace", 1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modparam("siptrace", "trace_flag", "TRACE")
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modparam("siptrace", "trace_on", 1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modparam("siptrace", "trace_to_database", 0)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modparam("siptrace", "traced_user_avp", "$avp(called)")
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modparam("siptrace", "hep_version", 2)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modparam("siptrace", "hep_capture_id", 338)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> modparam("siptrace", "duplicate_uri",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "sip:172.16.1.99:9060") modparam("siptrace",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "duplicate_with_hep", 1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and here is how I am using siptrace in my script.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> route{
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      setflag(TRACE);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      sip_trace();
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Below is a capture (from ngrep) of a packet that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> through this error.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> INVITE sip:12063430011 at yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy SIP/2.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Record-Route:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> <sip:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx;lr;ftag=0m15597FNecKe;schip=d4c.b840a454>.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060;branch=z9hG4bK0533.69b5df66.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> 172.16.1.105;received=172.16.1.105;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK3Uj0ye5ve15SK.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Max-Forwards: 69.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: "Unknown"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <sip:9999999999 at 172.16.1.115>;tag=0m15597FNecKe.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: <sip:19999999999 at 172.16.1.115>.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Call-ID: a7747eca-ea88-1230-e489-57cd493474a3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CSeq: 39716116 INVITE.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Contact:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> <sip:gw+opensips at 172.16.1.105:5060;transport=udp;gw=opensips>.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> User-Agent: FS.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UPDATE, INFO, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Supported: timer, precondition, path, replaces.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Allow-Events: talk, hold, refer.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Session-Expires: 120;refresher=uac.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Min-SE: 120.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Type: application/sdp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Disposition: session.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Content-Length: 247.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> P-Call-Type: Notification.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> X-FS-Support: update_display,send_info.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Remote-Party-ID: "Unknown"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> <sip:9999999999 at 172.16.1.115>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> v=0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> o=FreeSWITCH 1360080758 1360080759 IN IP4 zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> s=FreeSWITCH.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c=IN IP4 zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> t=0 0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> m=audio 29516 RTP/AVP 0 8 3 101.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a=fmtp:101 0-16.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a=silenceSupp:off - - - -.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a=ptime:20.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a=schipmangled:yes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Users at lists.opensips.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users




More information about the Users mailing list