[OpenSIPS-Users] Decrease the priority of contact
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
bogdan at opensips.org
Wed Feb 6 21:21:07 CET 2013
Hi Gomtesh,
Theoretically it is possible, but it is not trivial or simple.
I'm still recommending you to do it from script by using the
remove_branch() function and keeping in localcache the index of the last
removed contact.
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 01/31/2013 10:14 AM, Gomtesh Jain wrote:
> Hi Duane/Bogdan ,
> Yes I want to do Round Robin distribution of calls .
>
> To remove branch , I will have to know which branch got the last
> call . For that I need to keep contact in cache .
>
> In lookup.c after getting records and setting RURI , what if I do
> ul.update_ucontact() for first contact in the list .
> Something like this ..
>
>
> res = ul.get_urecord((udomain_t*)_t, &aor, &r);
> if (res > 0) {
> LM_DBG("'%.*s' Not found in usrloc\n", aor.len,
> ZSW(aor.s));
> ul.unlock_udomain((udomain_t*)_t, &aor);
> return -1;
> }
>
> .
> .
> .
>
> if (ptr) {
> LM_DBG("setting as ruri <%.*s>\n",ptr->c.len,ptr->c.s);
> if (set_ruri(_m, &ptr->c) < 0) {
> LM_ERR("unable to rewrite Request-URI\n");
> ret = -3;
> goto done;
> }
> .
> .
> .
> .
> set_ruri_q(ptr->q);
> .
> .
> .
> .
> ul.update_contact (); to update q value of contact
>
>
>
> Will that work ? ...Any side effect ?
>
>
> Thanx,
> Gomtesh
>
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> <bogdan at opensips.org <mailto:bogdan at opensips.org>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I agree with Duane - what you are trying to do is exceeding the
> purpose of registration - you want to do a Round Robin between the
> 2 registered contacts.
>
> What you could try is to let lookup() to bring both of them and to
> drop one of the contacts from script (wither simply removing the
> branch via $branch var, either via branch route).
>
> Regards,
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
> http://www.opensips-solutions.com
>
>
> On 01/30/2013 12:18 PM, Gomtesh Jain wrote:
>>
>> Thanx Duane for replying the mail ..
>>
>> Let me explain you my scenario ...
>>
>> I have 2 registered contact
>> 1 . 1234 (q value .9)
>> 2 5678 (q value .8)
>>
>> On IIVITE after lookup() 1234 will be on top of list . So
>> after lookup I just want to update contact 1234 with q value
>> .7 in memory/data base .
>> So that for next call 5678 should come on top of the list for
>> 2nd INVITE .
>>
>> So I want make changes in memory/database so that 5678 should
>> be picked up as first contact by very next INVITE .
>>
>> Thanx,
>> Gomtesh
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:50 AM,
>> <users-request at lists.opensips.org
>> <mailto:users-request at lists.opensips.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Send Users mailing list submissions to
>> users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:users at lists.opensips.org>
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> users-request at lists.opensips.org
>> <mailto:users-request at lists.opensips.org>
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> users-owner at lists.opensips.org
>> <mailto:users-owner at lists.opensips.org>
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is
>> more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of Users digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Re: Failover and dialog termination (microx)
>> 2. Re: Decrease the priority of contact (Duane Larson)
>> 3. Re: Carrierroute failure route enhancement (Samuel
>> Muller)
>> 4. [RELEASE] OpenSIPS 1.9.0 - a new major release is out
>> (Bogdan-Andrei Iancu)
>> 5. [RELEASES] Support and management of OpenSIPS
>> release -
>> IMPORTANT (Bogdan-Andrei Iancu)
>> 6. Re: [RELEASE] OpenSIPS 1.9.0 - a new major release
>> is out (Bakko)
>> 7. Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [RELEASE] OpenSIPS 1.9.0 - a
>> new major
>> release is out (Sa?l Ibarra Corretg?)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 06:12:46 -0800 (PST)
>> From: microx <acmicrox at gmail.com <mailto:acmicrox at gmail.com>>
>> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Failover and dialog termination
>> To: users at lists.opensips.org
>> <mailto:users at lists.opensips.org>
>> Message-ID: <1359468766526-7584255.post at n2.nabble.com
>> <mailto:1359468766526-7584255.post at n2.nabble.com>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>
>> Hi Schneur,
>>
>> Yes, the two proxy servers PA and PB are using the same
>> database. And the
>> db_mode regarding dialog
>> is set to 1 to make each dialog be written into memory as
>> well as the
>> database.
>>
>> What do you mean master/master replication? Can you
>> specify your method?
>> Thanks so much.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Chen-Che
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://opensips-open-sip-server.1449251.n2.nabble.com/Failover-and-dialog-termination-tp7584192p7584255.html
>> Sent from the OpenSIPS - Users mailing list archive at
>> Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:39:22 -0600
>> From: Duane Larson <duane.larson at gmail.com
>> <mailto:duane.larson at gmail.com>>
>> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Decrease the priority of
>> contact
>> To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
>> <users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:users at lists.opensips.org>>
>> Message-ID:
>> <CAFcM1EqZxr_FhVkJswpBNPK5wueE-9PvJPJFCof0nr4GHAtpDg at mail.gmail.com
>> <mailto:CAFcM1EqZxr_FhVkJswpBNPK5wueE-9PvJPJFCof0nr4GHAtpDg at mail.gmail.com>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> I'm not 100% sure what you are trying to do. I needed to
>> do some serial
>> calling and here is what I did
>>
>> http://opensips-open-sip-server.1449251.n2.nabble.com/opensips-Bugs-3349030-Need-access-to-SIP-URI-Q-Value-td6554597.html
>>
>> http://www.opensips.org/Resources/DocsCoreVar19#toc75
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Gomtesh Jain
>> <gomtesh at gmail.com <mailto:gomtesh at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi ,
>> > I want to decrease the priority (q value) of contact
>> (in memory &
>> > database)as soon as it comes on top of the list after
>> lookup. So that next
>> > call should not pick this contact (if other contacts
>> are registered). As
>> > soon as call finishes client will refresh its
>> registration with original q
>> > value.
>> > How can I do this either in script after lookup() or in
>> code in around
>> > lookup.c ?
>> >
>> > Can someone help me on this ?
>> >
>> > Thanx,
>> > Gomtesh
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Users mailing list
>> > Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>> > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> *--*--*--*--*--*
>> Duane
>> *--*--*--*--*--*
>> --
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130129/d66ee50b/attachment-0001.htm>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users at lists.opensips.org>
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130206/eb123a8b/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Users
mailing list