[OpenSIPS-Users] [OpenSIPS-Devel] [RELEASES] Planing OpenSIPS 1.9.0 major release

Ali Pey alipey at gmail.com
Wed Oct 31 18:17:28 CET 2012


Which one sounds simpler? Having a new layer of proxies and extra hardware
on different software packages with their own set of configurations,
limitations and bugs than having WebSocket enabled on opensips and control
your routing logic all in one place off of same DB.

Regards,
Ali Pey


On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc at aliax.net> wrote:

> 2012/10/31 Ali Pey <alipey at gmail.com>
>
>> Using OverSIP and the OpenSIPS would make things just more complex
>> specially for larger deployments.
>
>
> Really? IMHO it makes things MUCH MORE simple. Use OverSIP as an Outbound
> EDGE Proxy and you are done. Otherwise wait for a proper TCP/TLS and
> WebSocket support in OpenSIPS.
>
> In a large deployment run N OverSIP proxies in front of your OpenSIPS
> registrar. Just it.
>
> --
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> <ibc at aliax.net>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121031/9180d8e0/attachment.htm>


More information about the Users mailing list